Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd July 2007, 03:16 PM   #1
Audio Junkie
diyAudio Member
 
Zero Cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MN
Default X-max = V.C. Length????

How does one determine the Xmax of a driver?

I have a couple of dead subwoofers that i have removed the cone and V.C from and i am curious what the Xmas is. the MFG of the driver mentioned they had an abundance of xmax but because the drivers are proprietary they cant tell me the specs....so now i am curious.

Wouldn't it just be the length of the V.C. winding???



Zc
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007, 03:36 PM   #2
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
It's the length of the voicecoil that stays in the gap. But that is only part of the story - how linear that travel is, is another matter.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007, 03:58 PM   #3
Audio Junkie
diyAudio Member
 
Zero Cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MN
Ok got it. yes linear another story. I am just curious what "an abundance" of xmax meant to this MFG? these days 2" peak to peak isn't unusual for a 18" driver.


Zc
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007, 04:04 PM   #4
oshifis is offline oshifis  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Hm, dead drivers, secret specs... I wouldn't spend any effort in them unless they were free.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007, 04:17 PM   #5
Warp Engineer
On Holiday
 
AudioFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Queensland, Australia
As an approximation for Peak to Peak Xmax,

For overhung voice coils it will be roughly
Xmax = voice coil length - gap length

For underhung voice coils it will be roughly
Xmax = gap length - voice coil length
__________________
- Dan
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007, 05:23 PM   #6
Svante is offline Svante  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Svante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
Quote:
Originally posted by AudioFreak
As an approximation for Peak to Peak Xmax,

For overhung voice coils it will be roughly
Xmax = voice coil length - gap length

For underhung voice coils it will be roughly
Xmax = gap length - voice coil length
There are different definitions for xmax. The above would approximately result in the maximum linear peak-to-peak travel of the voice coil. I would say that it is more common to divide this number by 2, to get the one-way peak travel.

Anyway, this means that one has to look careful for how the numbers were obtained when comparing xmax figures between drivers, and in particular between manufacturers.
__________________
Simulate loudspeakers: Basta!
Simulate the baffle step: The Edge
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007, 05:35 PM   #7
Warp Engineer
On Holiday
 
AudioFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Queensland, Australia
Quote:
Originally posted by Svante


There are different definitions for xmax. The above would approximately result in the maximum linear peak-to-peak travel of the voice coil. I would say that it is more common to divide this number by 2, to get the one-way peak travel.
Yes, that's why I specified Peak to Peak.

Quote:
Originally posted by Svante


Anyway, this means that one has to look careful for how the numbers were obtained when comparing xmax figures between drivers, and in particular between manufacturers.
Indeed not all Xmax (generally accepted as linear travel) figures are equal and then just to confuse matters further there is also Xmech (mechanical travel before damage results) which is also sometimes listed in spec sheets.
__________________
- Dan
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007, 09:22 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Luke (Uof Iowa)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Iowa City
Some manufacturers use other measurements such as where BL becomes 70% of at rest or using a DUMAX machine. I think there might be a Klippel tool to measure it as well, but I can't remember one specifically.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2007, 03:30 PM   #9
Audio Junkie
diyAudio Member
 
Zero Cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MN
Quote:
Originally posted by AudioFreak
As an approximation for Peak to Peak Xmax,

For overhung voice coils it will be roughly
Xmax = voice coil length - gap length

For underhung voice coils it will be roughly
Xmax = gap length - voice coil length
Ok i measure a 25mm V.C. Winding length. with a top plate of about 8mm. So should i figure 25 / 2 = 12.5mm one way - 8mm plate = 4.5mm xmax? 9mm P-P xmax?? approximately??

I understand that this is not an exact. just a rough guess.


Zc
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2007, 04:13 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Leeds, UK
25mm vc - 8mm gap = 17mm peak to peak or 8.5mm one way
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
problem.... with TL length AudioGeek Multi-Way 7 20th August 2004 10:48 PM
TL length question theChris Multi-Way 18 5th January 2004 07:45 AM
port length busterno1 Multi-Way 5 27th October 2003 08:05 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:04 AM.

Page generated in 0.12475 seconds (79.28% PHP - 20.72% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio