|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reading PA
|
hello all
ive been trying to design a set of TMWWs for me for a little while now and i THINK i might have a handle on it now since this is going to be my first "my design" build id like to make sure i have all my Is dotted and my Ts crossed so to speak............especially with spending the money that these seem to be turning out to be driver compliment is <so far > going to be: morel MDT-37 tweeter : Aurum Cantus AC-130MKII doing the mid-bass thing and a pair of Audax HT240G0 10" taking care of the lower end .......these drivers are of course are not "set in stone" if someone has any good ideas enclosed please find a pic of the X over for these.......... xover frreqs are 2250 and 175..............was designed with speaker workshop cabs will be a 7.4cube ported at 29hz for the 10" morels <2 per cab> and a .5 <ish> sealed for the AC......... all opinions suggestions comments and poking fun at are more than welcomed TIA scott |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reading PA
|
anybody?
thanx again scott |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brisbane, QLD
|
Quote:
Sure! ![]() The crossovers: I would've thought that it's more important to get rid of high frequencies from the woofer, and not so important to have a steep high-pass filter for the tweeter, unless your main concern is power handling.
__________________
Lech |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
My guess is that you will be low on midrange SPL ... a single 5" with double 10" .... the result may be heavy and boomy bass
Those Audax does look very nice But the 10" is a strange driver with strange specs ..... 4ohm, high Fs, high Qts, high SPL, low VAS, 7mm Xmax, double magnet .... surely intended fore a very special design With double 10" in BR, you will need drivers with low Qts MAYBE, if you used a plateamp on woofers in closed box .... still, I think that Fs=50hz on a 10" is on the high side But, you could be lucky, who knows |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reading PA
|
that audax driver did look neat...strange but neat........
after kicking it around i believe you guys are right heres another design im working on ............ single Morel MDT-37 double Aurum Cantus AC-130MKII single Dayton RS270S-8 10" probably set up as a MID-TWEETER-MID-WOOFER 5.0 cf box for the dayton ported @ 29hz .142 cube sealed for the pair of ACs cross over points are 2250 and 175 what do you guys think of this one??? thanx again scott |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Now its the other way round .... one mid will do .... or else this time you WILL need double woofers
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
http://www.rjbaudio.com/Audiofiles/FRDtools.html
Hi, Try dotting your I's and crossing your T's according to the above. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
And you might consider the AurumCantus AC-130F1 .... looks VERY smooth and easy to control ... I do prefer a nice curved cone fore mids
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reading PA
|
ive run the FRD tools untill my head almost hurt lol
i really like the curve on the F1 where do you think would be a good crossover point for it?? scott |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Hard to say .... anywhere between 2-4khz
Well, serious .... its "modern" these days to cross around 2khz, before the driver loose too much dispersion On the other hand, this puts more stress on the tweeter ..... which I think is very much audible .... and because of the need fore steep slopes maybe only recommendable fore 2ways With low xo point you get the advantage of a much broader "sweetspot" .... but in my opinion also less precise and defined, in other words a bit diffuse and out of phase .... I reckon its in its nature, but only my personal experiense and I may have been wrong on this matter With higher xo point you get very precise and welldefined imaging with good "pinpointing" effect.... on the other hand also a VERY "narrow" sweetspot, which means that you only have perfect imaging when listening EXACTLY in the middle .... move just a bit to one side, and its lost .... suits me fine though Listen to the driver and judge from that .... and dont expect it to be perfect in first try .... my advise will be to work with simple solutions, which also means drivers that are wellbehaved outside their passband BTW .. this is how my crossover looks like .... I dont think I can get more out of the drivers used .... my next speaker will be much simpler ..... small Jordan(?) fullrange with a 12" woofer
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| looking for opinions on amp design. | armstrom | Solid State | 1 | 27th June 2008 08:11 PM |
| Opinions on this HT-sub design please. | ßart West-VL. | Subwoofers | 19 | 7th May 2008 02:05 PM |
| Opinions on this B&C design. | Paul Dimaline | Multi-Way | 25 | 5th December 2006 05:57 AM |
| ht design opinions | ucla88 | Multi-Way | 12 | 4th January 2002 04:58 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11262 seconds (78.08% PHP - 21.92% MySQL) with 11 queries |