|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: west lafayette
|
I was previously under the impression that dipoles maintained consistent and homogeneous power response throughout their passbands (assuming the driver had not started beaming), but I neglected to include the influence of the "dipole gain" at lower frequencies. How does the gain affect on and off-axis response?
Also, I was wondering the -X dB @ Y hz points for a dipole was (above the dipole peak, it should have consistent power response). In my basic understanding of power response, I came to realize that most drivers are omnidirectional 1 octave below the fundamental wavelength of their diameter (ie flat power response below this frequency). I also thought that dipole drivers may be able to ascend higher in frequency with consistent power response since some of their horizontal dispersion is already cancelled by the rear wave. If we could take the driver up to a certain point where it began beaming and achieved same power response as a dipole (ie less of the sidewave was cancelled since the driver was beginning to beam, but it matched the response. We achieve the same power response through different means, cancellation and beaming). This concept is really hard for me to convey, so please ask questions if you have any clue as to what I'm talking about. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: west lafayette
|
upp
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Transient Response: Sealed v Dipole | rick57 | Multi-Way | 4 | 12th December 2006 05:26 AM |
| Is Eminence beta 15 good 4 dipole sub(need quick response) | fergs1 | Subwoofers | 4 | 28th October 2006 09:38 AM |
| Dipole questions using Seas Excel | tf1216 | Multi-Way | 3 | 2nd March 2006 07:45 PM |
| Room mode, so bad bass frequency response (with or without dipole) ;( | mbon | Multi-Way | 2 | 21st June 2004 05:53 AM |
| Dipole sub parameters questions | A3rd.Zero | Multi-Way | 6 | 29th April 2004 03:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06795 seconds (67.00% PHP - 33.00% MySQL) with 10 queries |