|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
what are the pros and cons of long xmax in bass guitar drivers?
For sure pro is high power whitstand ability at low frequency. Any other pros? Any cons? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Linearity
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
In general:
A long xmax makes the driver capable of louder sound at low frequencies with less distortion. A long xmax also reduces efficiency if the voice coil is underhung*; much of the coil is not subjected to magnetic field, which means that it will not deliver any force to the cone. It will just consume power and add weight to the moving system. I can imagine that distortion is less of a problem in guitar loudspeakers, distortion may very well be a desired feature of the system. However, for hifi use, distortion is bad. *Almost all drivers have underhung voice coils. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: currently in China
|
Hi Svante,
"underhung*" you mean overhung ? Hartono |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Sorry, did not understand "overhung". Does it mean, that coil is out of gap?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: currently in China
|
yes the voice coil is longer than the gap
there's some way to keep linearity with overhung voice coil, this involve some technique in linearizing BL over excursion , and other techniques. edit: usually if this technique is used in the driver, the manufacturer will mention it |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brisbane, QLD
|
I've found that one of the cons of high excursion drivers is fatiguing of the (rubber) surrounds. Because the surround is wider, it also has to be thicker, and it hardens after a while from all the flexing.
And maybe deep bass isn't the biggest problem? Lots of speakers can handle it. For a bass guitar I'm guessing you'll want deep bass and good performance up to around 400Hz, so that you can play a high G at ~196Hz and still reproduce the 2nd harmonic with a good 'attack'. How about using an array of smaller drivers instead of a single large one?
__________________
Lech |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: currently in China
|
I think for bass guitar application , the linearity is not the important one, the important one is how the end result "sound"
warm, full of tone , deep ... etc |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pros/cons of a 845 VS 211 | jarthel | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 18th June 2007 12:57 PM |
| TL vs MLTL, pros and cons | Tomac | Multi-Way | 5 | 29th December 2004 12:55 PM |
| Filterless DAC - pros and cons? | mr_push_pull | Digital Source | 1 | 11th August 2004 02:56 PM |
| Pros and Cons of this technique? | G | Tubes / Valves | 35 | 23rd October 2003 05:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08609 seconds (84.79% PHP - 15.21% MySQL) with 10 queries |