|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
If you have a set of speakers with front and rear chambers and a plate amp on the back along with a woofer and a 3 way on the front as seen in the picture, is that known as a bi-amped 4 way or does it qualify as a 3 way 2.2 system? Does the .2 necessarily indicate a separate cabinet for each woofer?
EDIT: the front midbass has a high pass filter on it. Curious Cal wants to know. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Norlane; Geelong: Victoria: Australia
|
Just to display my ignorance; if the front mounted midwoofer has a high pass filter, does the plate amp have the usual High/low second order filter and is the high pass on the midwoofer a single cap or is it more complicated than that??
Nomenclature seems to depend on who builds it. I have always thought that my towers were just nonstandard three ways but in another forum I was told emphatically that had to desribe them as a 4wayby one person and 3.5 way by another: is there a convention we should be working towards?? ted
__________________
QUOTE" The more I know, the more I know, I know (insert maniacal laugh >here<) NOTHING" |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
|
High pass filter means it's a bi-amped 4 way. If there was no high pass filter it would be a 3-way with subwoofer
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
My vote goes for bi-amped 4 way.
4 drivers, covering 4 frequency ranges (assuming no overlap between midwoof and sub). With overlap, bi-amped 3.5? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
|
well, 3.5 way in my understanding has always been when you use two of the same woofer to cover different frequency ranges. (ie. two of whatever the largest woofer is, one with a high-pass filter, one without)
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
True. My mistake. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Cal,
It is a biamped 4-way. In an x.5-way system an even number of (usually identical) woofers of mid-woofers with half of the drivers covering the range up to the next driver (mid or tweeter) and going all the way down. The other half (0.5 driver(s)) of are crossed over below the baffle-step to fill in the BS loss. XO on the 0.5 unit(s) is usually 1st order. A 2.2 system would refer ro an HT system with Left & Right and 2 subwooders feed LFE channel(s) dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
OK gotcha. Thanks Dave, now I can sleep at night.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| what is this called | skullkeeper | Parts | 1 | 23rd April 2009 11:28 PM |
| What is this Amp design called? | packer | Solid State | 2 | 1st March 2009 12:11 AM |
| What is this cap called? | intensem1rider | Parts | 6 | 20th March 2008 05:34 AM |
| What is this topology called? | teemuk | Solid State | 7 | 27th July 2007 09:52 AM |
| What is this connector called? | megajocke | Parts | 10 | 7th February 2007 06:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10663 seconds (82.23% PHP - 17.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |