|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Quinte Ontario Canada
|
I mentioned some time back that I had made a deal with my wife that I would get rid of many of the ends and odds that I have collected over the years as I pursued my interest in vintage speakers.
For the most part that means stripping down many of the speakers I have and throwing out the cabinets. Don't worry as these various yard sale finds all have severally damage cabinets. SOOoooo anyway I take apart these old large Wharfdale 2 ways (w60's I think). I've always thought these speakers were too darn heavy even given their considerable size. ![]() I pulled the back panels and as I handled the panel I though that just isn't right. Its way to flippin heavy. So I had a look at it. ![]() It is not unusal for old speakers to have composite panels but I noticed this one had plugged holes in one end. ![]() I got some tools and carefully pulled the lamination apart and low and behold its filled with sand. ![]() ![]() You know as you look at the build quality of these old Wharfdales you can not help but be impressed. Unfortunately this pair got wet in a flooded basement and then had several coats of house paint applied before I found them. Anyway I thought it was interesting and thought I'd share. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Quinte Ontario Canada
|
I had a good look at the rest of the cabinet and it appears its only the back panel that was constructed this way. I will know for certain when I take the cabinets out back tomorrow.
So I guess this was done just to add some weight vs resonance control. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Quinte Ontario Canada
|
I'm a little surprised this didn't generate more interest. I certainly found it surprising
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Custom Title
diyAudio Member
|
It's interesting, but what's to say? Nice to see that kind of effort in a cab...
__________________
I write for www.enjoythemusic.com in the DIY section. You may find yourself getting a preview of a project in-progress. Be warned! |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Quote:
Regarding the Wharfedales I'm not really surprised about the sand because it's commonly done for deadening walls in recording studios but I was astonished that such a costly technique would be used in relatively affordable speakers. The W60's cost about $250.00 in the mid-1960's. That may sound like a lot for the era but one must remember that kitchen radios sold for over $100.00 in those days and a small color TV went for over $500.00 so the W60 itself was a bargain even though the electronics required to drive it properly probably cost an arm and a leg. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Quinte Ontario Canada
|
It grabbed my interest not only because I was surprised to find it but because it is an easily duplicated method for the DIY'er.
I may very well try it on an upcoming project although I'm still leaning more toward hidden compartments that I can drop lead ingots into. (Only because I can remove the lead to make moving the speakers easier) If I was to use the Whardale method I was thinking of making all of the panels this way including the front baffle. The additional weight offers obvious benefits but how much benefit do you think it offers in controlling resonances? |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Quote:
I'm not sure using lead ingots wouldn't have an effect on the sound, because sand itself has different sonic properties (progressive damping I imagine) than purely reflective metal. That may be the reason why Wharfedale opted to use sand, and this is really what I'd like to find out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hong Kong
|
One thing puzzled me... How to ensure the cavity to be fully filled without void? Did they fill sand through the little plug hole??
I can imagine the panel play like a Maracas if there is void within. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Quinte Ontario Canada
|
Yes they filled it though the hole(s) at the top of the panel. There were two holes. AS long as the interior shape is designed with a bit of thought there is no reason to not be able to fill it totally. You could also use a vibrator (palm sander with no paper would work) to make sure there were no air pockets.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| has any one built a hexagon shaped cabinet | mcmahon48 | Multi-Way | 6 | 21st April 2009 06:03 PM |
| Speaker cabinet for vintage 12" philips driver | divingboy | Full Range | 1 | 28th December 2008 09:39 AM |
| Right cabinet for these vintage Coral drivers | atilsley | Multi-Way | 8 | 7th November 2008 08:33 AM |
| Most Impressive, Beautiful Veneer for speaker baffles | thadman | Multi-Way | 7 | 15th August 2007 11:44 PM |
| Is laminated pine good for cabinet? | andy2 | Multi-Way | 3 | 17th March 2005 08:21 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11406 seconds (80.93% PHP - 19.07% MySQL) with 10 queries |