|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Just thinking too much as usual, and wondering how a CSS FR125s would go with a 12inch woofer in a triangle-baffle shaped cabinet. Needs to go pretty loud. Would the FR125s keep up with the 12" at highish spl given that it would be high passed? I keep hearing how nice these fullrangers are and I would love to try some, but I generally listen quite loud and to music with lots of bass content.
Feel free to tell me it's a stupid idea. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the netherlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Its not a good idea at all to mate a FR125 with a 12"
FR125 is far too inefficient and cant play loud at all it might help with a highpass filter, and get the midrange up a bit, but I dont think it will be sufficient - you will be low on midrange If you want to play loud, then a widerange that will do that, might still be in need of a supertweeter Maybe something like this one http://professional.celestion.com/pr...etail.asp?ID=1 |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Hmmm it is inefficient isn't it. I guess it's like being good at maths and a great footballer....
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Considering the sensitivity of the average 12" sub and baffle step I don't see why they couldn't be used together. Heck he may not even need BSC.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I think you say something like .... "no free lunch" or maybe ... "you cant have it all" ... or .." have your cake and eat it too"
Here we say ... " the trees dont grow into heaven"... or .. "you cant blow and have flour in your mouth" ![]() I think the FR125 is somewhat overrated - well its damm fine at low levels fore sure, but I would never push it hard and expect it to "rock and roll" at loud levels It has been said that there is no substitute fore high sensitivity |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
umm...ok...an explanation would be more helpful of why or why not.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
High sensitivity or high SPL capability? I'm buidling a PA dipole to check out the former, but I agree with the latter for sure. Although the may not be as important to the OP.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
At some time I thought about using multiple FR125, but it gets rather expencive - and after I have listened to one, I dont think its worth the effort
edit ... I guess its a matter of distortion figures and how much power the driver can take But I might make an experiment and make a highpass filter fore my FR125... and give it a listen edit .... this new little 88db "fellow" might be interesting, and cost is only 11 EUR http://www.visaton.de/de/chassis_zub...d/frs8m_8.html |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
ah. I see.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A new (Stupid?) class d idea | Tekko | Class D | 79 | 5th December 2006 03:01 AM |
| New idea for FR125S box | Rafal | Full Range | 13 | 10th March 2006 06:00 AM |
| remote OPT, stupid idea ? | Jaap | Tubes / Valves | 17 | 30th September 2005 03:35 PM |
| Remote Power Supply: A Stupid Idea? | SRMcGee | Tubes / Valves | 22 | 29th September 2005 10:37 PM |
| A stupid idea | DcibeL | Solid State | 12 | 2nd July 2005 03:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09116 seconds (83.63% PHP - 16.37% MySQL) with 10 queries |