|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
I have a dream of first order crossed monitor with Seas CA15RLY and 27TDC. What do you think abaut this combination of drivers and x-over slopes together. ??
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bungawalbyn, NSW
|
Pros: Simplicity, Good drivers, Potentially very transparent. Cons: Lobing, Tweeter power handling and resonance, Uneven response. Try it. If you don't like the cons, build a second order or higher filter. If you still aren't happy, try zobels, and BSC. http://www.rjbaudio.com/Calypso/calypso.html If that's not what you want then try Fostex FE167E! No tweeter, not caps, no inductors, nada. Regards, Bob |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
I have no drivers yet. My dream is first order design like many high end speakers. I would like to use Seas drivers. I think that when first order filtering is used response of drivers shoud be flat, smoothrolling and wide. Those drivers are best from Seas I think. X-over freq. would be abaut 3500-5000 Hz. Front panel A4. Ported box.
What do you think, is there something else keep on mind when first order filtering a loudspeaker. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
as Bob suggested - "the best filter is no filter at all" but if you insist on a 2-way, finding a main driver driver with wide enough BW and smooth enough roll off on axis to eliminate need for a LP, and a tweeter with complementary requirements can certainly simplify the XO requirements Our Scandinavian friends make many fine drivers, but not to be overlooked are the Fostex FE/FF & FW/FT series. You might want to look for a local dealer or DIYer with a Fostex based system to audition. While there's no doubt their presentation is not everyone's cup of tea - you won't know until you've tasted. As for measured or modeled FR - there's "flat and smooth", and then there's "lifeless" Having built several systems in the past with Vifa & Peerless drivers and "properly engineered" XO networks, with crossover points in the upper MR area (e.g. 3200Hz) , I certainly know where my preference lies. For example FE167 & FT17H with a single 1.5uf cap will give you a smooth 1st order HP on the tweeter hinged somewhere around 12000Hz or so, with no LP pole required for the mid/bass driver at all. Although some would argue that notch filtering might be necessary for upper midrange peaks, phase plugs and judicious cone treatment have mitigated that for many. For a US retail difference of approx $20 more for the drivers, (offset by the reduced complexity of required XO filter network), you can expect among other things, an increased sensitivity of over 6dB vs the SEAS. as always, YMMV, Caveat emptor, etc |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
Check out
http://www.rjbaudio.com/Calypso/calypso.html You could try it with the simplest possible xover & then upgrade it if you're not happy |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Is there any other opinions.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
|
No crossover or a BSC circuit on a JX-92s makes a fine sealed, ported or transmission line speaker. Very few drivers are as flexible with alignment. The drivers are more expensive from the Seas, but crossover parts can easily make up that difference.
I built a sealed monitor with the JX-92 about 8 years ago now and it never fails to impress as long as you aren't looking for a high spl solution. C |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
There are very few genuine 1st order acoustic (linear phase) designs. Many speakers with 1st order electrical filters claim the benefits that you would get with a 1st order acoustic design, complete marketing BS. http://www.t-linespeakers.org/projects/rune/index.html Is a lot more first order than most. If you bi-amp the 1st order filters can be easily and cheaply implemented passively at the input to the amplifiers. No chance of a proper 1st order 2 way with 1" dome tweeters. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kent
|
If you are interested more in the simplicity of the crossover than a linear phase 1st order acoustic slope, have a look at my recently made speakers using the Seas coaxial driver. It has no low pass on the woofer at all, and just a single capacitor and a resistor on the tweeter. I did implement BSC on the woofer though.
Speekerz wot I maid If you actually want a two way 1st order acoustic slope speaker the only option I can think of is using a Manger driver with a nice 8" woofer. The ScanSpeak 18w would be my choice. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wanted - High Power, High Voltage, Audio Frequency Transformer Manual. | kimbal | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 11th May 2009 08:05 PM |
| I coined the phrase HIGH VIVIDITY, to differentiate our amps from High Fidelity ones | vax9000 | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 31st October 2006 01:10 AM |
| 6BY5 High Voltage & High Current Choke Input Design P.S. | snoopyma | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 28th June 2006 01:32 PM |
| First time caller, long time listener... | smallangryboy | Introductions | 15 | 19th March 2005 08:10 PM |
| is doing time alignment now a waste of time? | Beggar | Multi-Way | 9 | 28th July 2003 05:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12432 seconds (85.01% PHP - 14.99% MySQL) with 10 queries |