
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Gallery  Wiki  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
MultiWay Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
10th August 2010, 06:50 PM  #7091  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Georgia

Quote:
Do you have offaxis measurements of the horn you can share? Thanks, Paul
__________________
Paul 

10th August 2010, 08:33 PM  #7092  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suomi

One can measure "frequency response" of the LTI system by inserting a number of sinusoids each having infinite duration. Then output will have a number of sinusoids each having infinite length. The "frequency response" is amplitude and phase of these sinusoids at each frequency included in the analysis. When input and output of the system consists of sinusoid of infinite length, the system is at steady state.
One can measure exactly the same "frequency response" by calculating the fourier transform of the system's impulse response. Since the system can be only at one state at a time, steady state in this case, thus the output of the fourier transform of the impulse response is a steady state response at each particular frequency where the analysis is calculated. "Frequency response" IS a steady state measure.  Elias Quote:
Last edited by Elias; 10th August 2010 at 08:35 PM. 

10th August 2010, 08:41 PM  #7093  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Silverdale, WA

Quote:
The 10degree curve follows the onaxis curve almost exactly! From there, it does much what one would expect from the simulations. These readings were taken fairly closeup...about 26 inches from the front of the horn. Ignore the dB scale  the gain of my power amp hasn't yet been entered into ARTA. Gary Dahl
__________________
"So many tubes, so little time..." 

10th August 2010, 09:35 PM  #7094 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006

Paul I think Gary's Azura horn is the same as the one I measured from Lynn. Results posted in my sig. Very nice off axis behavior.

10th August 2010, 09:37 PM  #7095 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Silverdale, WA

Thanks Brandon...
Yes, it's exactly the same model of horn (Azurahorn AH425). Gary Dahl
__________________
"So many tubes, so little time..." 
10th August 2010, 10:15 PM  #7096 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008

"Steady State" has nothing at all to do with it. Frequency Response is more typically measured with a log swept sine, inverse transforming the determined FR to get the impulse response. Is a log swept sine steady state? Is the system's response to the log swept sine steady state? The FR is a characterisation of the system's behaviour and can be determined by examining how the system alters a stimulus passed through it, no steady states required.
Apologies for the offtopic posts on this, I have an aversion to misconceptions. I'll stop now . Steady as you go, Elias. 
10th August 2010, 11:26 PM  #7097  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suomi

To be accurate, log sweep cannot measure system's impulse response. Not unless you start the sweep from DC. But one cannot do that because it would take infinite time to play the sweep. Anything else yields only approximation of the impulse response. In practise approximations are often sufficient, but it does not remove the (approximate) steady state condition requirement. The more 'steady stateiness' in the log sweep the more accurate is the measured impulse response. That is, the longer the sweep the more accurate is the impulse response. To understand this try to think what will happen if you make your log sweep infinitesimally short in duration.
 Elias Quote:


11th August 2010, 02:02 AM  #7098 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maine, USA

After over 7000 posts there's little that can be considered off the topic(s) of this thread.
JohnPM: Thanks for your concise, and I believe accurate, descriptions of the nature of frequency response measurements. I think you hit the crux of the matter when you highlighted the fact that the frequency response of a system is just a description of the way the system changes the amplitudes and phases of the various frequency components of any signal that passes through it (sorry for the paraphrasing). The variable t (time) does not appear in the frequency response; the frequency response has no time dependence. Nonethelessand this seems to be the source of the confusionthe frequency response can still be used to compute the way a system will respond to any timevarying signal, such as music. In short, the system's response to an arbitrary input varies over time but its frequency response does not. For the mathematically inclined, here's another link that describes the relationship between frequency response, impulse response, and transfer function. On the subject of approximations: It's certainly true that in the real world we make measurements which only approximate the system's true frequency response, but that doesn't alter the definition of the frequency response. It just means we need to take care when making use of our measurements to be sure we only apply them only within the range of their accuracy. Okay, I'm probably contributing to a subthread that's depleted the patience of some, so I'm going to go fishing for a few days. I hope my input yields the desired output. Wish me luck. Few 
11th August 2010, 02:29 AM  #7099 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Silverdale, WA

__________________
"So many tubes, so little time..." 
11th August 2010, 02:39 AM  #7100 
diyAudio Moderator

I'm very impressed with how well that little 16.5" horn does. Very nice FR. Nice and compact in size.
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


New To Site?  Need Help? 