Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th February 2008, 10:06 PM   #3121
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rapid City
Tony

Thanks. I was trying to save a few bucks but you are completely right. Do you think about 50 uF per bundle is a good starting point for these hemp midranges?

Jon
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2008, 10:18 PM   #3122
ttan98 is offline ttan98  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melb
Quote:
Originally posted by Graham Maynard
Two 10" to 12" LS side by side are going to lead to notable voice reproduction anomalies for any listening done off-axis, especially with a combining reflected rear wave.

Its not just the centre to centre spacing, but the overall spacing between outer cone edges which will promote frequency selective interferences.

Cheers ........... Graham.

Emerald physics has TWW configuration in open baffle, T is a compr driver and WW are twin 15" mounted side by side. The X-over between T and W is 1Khz using active LR4. See website:
http://emeraldphysics.com/specs.htm

for details.

These speakers received wide acceptance for their sound reproduction, how do you think the designer solve the problem you raised?
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2008, 10:38 PM   #3123
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Lynn the DE25 appears to be discontinued. What is the current replacement?
__________________
~Brandon
DriverVault Soma Sonus Old Driver Tests
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2008, 10:52 PM   #3124
diyAudio Member
 
apassgear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Viña del Mar, Torreon
Quote:
Originally posted by bonjonno
Tony

Thanks. I was trying to save a few bucks but you are completely right. Do you think about 50 uF per bundle is a good starting point for these hemp midranges?

Jon
Jon,

You will have to decide on the XO point and calculate your starting xo parts and test from there on. Lil’Buddy has Fs of 150 so the minimum XO point should be arround 300 hz on a 2nd order filter. Personally I would shoot for a 400/500 Hz point for some breathing space for the bass speaker also.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2008, 11:27 PM   #3125
diyAudio Member
 
Graham Maynard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Hi ttan98.

I see vertical mounting in your link, not horizontal ?

Cheers ........ Graham.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2008, 11:57 PM   #3126
dmason is offline dmason  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Republik of Kalifonia
My own uninformed opinion as to why the Emerald Physics OB offering was so well received is because there were a ton of people who had never heard a reasonably well executed FULL RANGE open baffle set up. Most of the people commenting were high dog, monkey coffin listeners, and those, sound nothing like OB. Second, the Emerald is about the only commercial offering I can think of that addressed employing open baffle response for the lower register/bass in the design; the Bastanis had similar approbation at these shows, but is in my mind, an essentially flawed design in that it uses sealed drivers for bass. The money zone in OB sonics is <1500Hz, as anyone whom has heard this likely will readily agree.

I also suspect "a" reason for the permanent, sealed opaque grilles is to obscure the fact that they are using some very inexpensive Eminence Alpha 15, and the bottom of the line BMS compression driver. What amazes me is the fact that the entire proceedings are dimmed and damaged by the Behringer active crossover these things are controlled by.

While I wish Emerald Physics all the success they deserve with their efforts, what makes this particular thread most interesting to me is that over time we will come up with permutations in design that should completely SLAY this arguably flawed commercial offering. Keeping the crossover away from the critical midband might be one start. When I heard the Emerald, I immediately preferred the presentation of the "DarkStar" if for no other reason that that it avoided any tampering between 200-10KHz. www.thuneau.com
__________________
"Pilau Buggah, Big Islan Mo Betta!!"
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2008, 12:57 AM   #3127
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North of Boston
Default Tone Tubby 12" Alnico FR

I have been unable to find a frequency responce graph for the Tone Tubbies. Can anyone point me to one? What upper cutoff frquency would you recommend for first/second order x-over?

thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2008, 01:38 AM   #3128
ScottG is offline ScottG  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: US
Default Re: Tone Tubby 12" Alnico FR

Quote:
Originally posted by patrickkopson
I have been unable to find a frequency responce graph for the Tone Tubbies. Can anyone point me to one? What upper cutoff frquency would you recommend for first/second order x-over?

thanks

http://www.nutshellhifi.com/MLS/MLS6.html
__________________
perspective is everything
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2008, 02:52 AM   #3129
ttan98 is offline ttan98  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melb
Quote:
Originally posted by augerpro
Lynn the DE25 appears to be discontinued. What is the current replacement?

DE10 may not be a direct replacement, have not checked the spec., however I have used DE10 it is very good, also recommended by Magnetar. min. X-over freq. is 2.5Khz. About $38 each, yes $38.

If you want to go upmarket, go for DE250, it is excellent, I heard from users no equalization is reqd. min. x-over freq. is 1.5Khz. I think with a little tweaking you can cross as low as 1Khz. About $130 each.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008, 04:30 AM   #3130
riff.ca is offline riff.ca  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Quote:
Originally posted by dmason
the Emerald is about the only commercial offering I can think of that addressed employing open baffle response for the lower register/bass in the design
There is this $14K effort from a Klipsh Group Company.

http://www.jamo.com/Default.aspx?ID=...roductID=17862
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:04 AM.

Page generated in 0.15293 seconds (61.12% PHP - 38.88% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio