Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Beyond the Ariel
Beyond the Ariel
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th December 2017, 10:33 AM   #14871
Ro808 is offline Ro808  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
A very concise definition is:

"The “end correction” is the distance from the open end of a pipe to the antinode just above it".
This applies to standing waves in a pipe.


From Wiki:
A theoretical basis for computation of the end correction is the radiation acoustic impedance of a circular piston. This impedance represents the ratio of acoustic pressure at the piston, divided by the flow rate induced by it. The air speed is typically assumed to be uniform across the tube end. This is a good approximation, but not exactly true in reality, since air viscosity reduces the flow rate in the boundary layer very close to the tube surface. Thus, air column inside the tube is loaded by the external fluid due to sound energy radiation. This requires an additional length to be added to the regular length for calculating the natural frequency of the pipe system.

The concept of End Correction is widely used in Structural and Fluid Dynamics, Antenna Theory and notably the Acoustics of musical instruments (pipe and horn).

The point of reflection for air pressure fronts in brass instruments is not at the end of the tube, but some distance outside of it. End correction is the difference between the end of the physical tube and the actual point of reflection. This distance differs according to frequency.

There is no scientifically proven and accepted value for the end correction of a resonant tube, various values ranging from 0.3r to 0.6r have been suggested from numerous disparate experiments. Lord Rayleigh was the first scientist to publish a figure, in 1871: it was 0.3r.

Consider a pipe closed at one end and open at the other. A simple model tells that resonance will occur when the pipe length (plus end correction) is 1/4,3/4,5/4 etc. of the sound wavelength by assumption that antinode occurs at the open end. Due to the pipe wall waves can't expand freely, so there is not a perfect antinode. By addition of an end correction, the pipe appears to be acoustically somewhat longer than its physical length.

The most accurate value appears to be 0.58r (It is independent of the wavelength but does depend on the shape of the tube. Value is quoted for a circular cross section). Normally in such experiments, you eliminate (and can calculate) the end correction by finding two consecutive resonating lengths L1 and L2 at the same frequency, for example two cases where the L1+c is 1/4 wavelength and L2+c is 3/4 wavelength. Subtracting gives L2 - L1 = half wavelength. In most experiments, the speed of sound in the tube is calculated. However, it must be remembered this is not the same as the speed in free air.

Martin J. King discussed end correction in his articles on Transmission Line and Back Loaded Horn Physics.

If I'm not mistaken, Danley Soundlabs has implemented (a form of) end correction in some of their Synergy horns.
The Equivalent Throat system is one of the few theories that includes end correction in the combined application of a compression driver + horn.


The science behind the end correction is thoroughly adressed by Neville H. Fletcher and Thomas D. Rossing in "The Physics of Musical Instruments".

The topic is also discussed in the works of:
Beranek
Howard and Craig
Kurze and Riedel
Junger and Feit
Morse and Feshbach, Morse and Ingard
and numerous others.

Last edited by Ro808; 16th December 2017 at 10:57 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2018, 12:14 AM   #14872
mikey_audiogeek is offline mikey_audiogeek  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Bump...
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2018, 12:49 AM   #14873
AllenB is offline AllenB  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
I take exception to the word correction. For example, a LeCleach horn has no end, it is infinite. A conical horn cannot be ended so it cannot be corrected. Other horns have complications that make the concept of correction illogical.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2018, 03:46 PM   #14874
Retsel is offline Retsel  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
"I take exception to the word correction. For example, a LeCleach horn has no end, it is infinite. A conical horn cannot be ended so it cannot be corrected. Other horns have complications that make the concept of correction illogical."

Why can't a roundover be added to the mouth of a conical horn to reduce resonances? Wouldn't the effect be the same as the roundover used with the LeCleach horn?

Retsel
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2018, 04:03 PM   #14875
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
gedlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
A properly flared horn/waveguide will not have any significant "end correction". The concept is ill-applied to a good waveguide.
__________________
Earl Geddes Gedlee Website
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2018, 04:23 PM   #14876
ivicai is offline ivicai  Serbia
diyAudio Member
 
ivicai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: belgrade
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ro808 View Post
A very concise definition is:

"The “end correction” is the distance from the open end of a pipe to the antinode just above it".
This applies to standing waves in a pipe.


From Wiki:
A theoretical basis for computation of the end correction is the radiation acoustic impedance of a circular piston. This impedance represents the ratio of acoustic pressure at the piston, divided by the flow rate induced by it. The air speed is typically assumed to be uniform across the tube end. This is a good approximation, but not exactly true in reality, since air viscosity reduces the flow rate in the boundary layer very close to the tube surface. Thus, air column inside the tube is loaded by the external fluid due to sound energy radiation. This requires an additional length to be added to the regular length for calculating the natural frequency of the pipe system.

The concept of End Correction is widely used in Structural and Fluid Dynamics, Antenna Theory and notably the Acoustics of musical instruments (pipe and horn).

The point of reflection for air pressure fronts in brass instruments is not at the end of the tube, but some distance outside of it. End correction is the difference between the end of the physical tube and the actual point of reflection. This distance differs according to frequency.

There is no scientifically proven and accepted value for the end correction of a resonant tube, various values ranging from 0.3r to 0.6r have been suggested from numerous disparate experiments. Lord Rayleigh was the first scientist to publish a figure, in 1871: it was 0.3r.

Consider a pipe closed at one end and open at the other. A simple model tells that resonance will occur when the pipe length (plus end correction) is 1/4,3/4,5/4 etc. of the sound wavelength by assumption that antinode occurs at the open end. Due to the pipe wall waves can't expand freely, so there is not a perfect antinode. By addition of an end correction, the pipe appears to be acoustically somewhat longer than its physical length.

The most accurate value appears to be 0.58r (It is independent of the wavelength but does depend on the shape of the tube. Value is quoted for a circular cross section). Normally in such experiments, you eliminate (and can calculate) the end correction by finding two consecutive resonating lengths L1 and L2 at the same frequency, for example two cases where the L1+c is 1/4 wavelength and L2+c is 3/4 wavelength. Subtracting gives L2 - L1 = half wavelength. In most experiments, the speed of sound in the tube is calculated. However, it must be remembered this is not the same as the speed in free air.

Martin J. King discussed end correction in his articles on Transmission Line and Back Loaded Horn Physics.

If I'm not mistaken, Danley Soundlabs has implemented (a form of) end correction in some of their Synergy horns.
The Equivalent Throat system is one of the few theories that includes end correction in the combined application of a compression driver + horn.


The science behind the end correction is thoroughly adressed by Neville H. Fletcher and Thomas D. Rossing in "The Physics of Musical Instruments".

The topic is also discussed in the works of:
Beranek
Howard and Craig
Kurze and Riedel
Junger and Feit
Morse and Feshbach, Morse and Ingard
and numerous others.
Hi Ro808,

Very nice presentation and and explanation.
So for the most of us understanding why some times resonance frequency of the bass-reflex box is not exactly on the 'desired' frequency, but fortunately, cutting some length of the vent(s) such problem would be 'solved'

Regards
ivica
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2018, 11:32 PM   #14877
tnargs is offline tnargs  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by gedlee View Post
A properly flared horn/waveguide will not have any significant "end correction". The concept is ill-applied to a good waveguide.
Thank you Earl.

On a different topic, my local horn manufacturer's chief designer recently told me that exponential horns still produce measured ripple when driven by a sine wavelength equal to the mouth circumference. Suggesting that the old linear model was inadequate.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2018, 07:22 PM   #14878
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
gedlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
The old linear model has been known to be inadequate since I wrote my Waveguide papers in 1991. All horns/waveguides produce "ripple" - some much much more than others. It's all about the design: flare: termination: phase plug; lots of different things can cause this well know problem.
__________________
Earl Geddes Gedlee Website
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2018, 05:52 AM   #14879
hollowboy is offline hollowboy  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 'straya
Quote:
Originally Posted by tnargs View Post
my local horn manufacturer's chief designer
I'm curious about who this could be. I didn't know there was a non-hobbyist manufacturer in Australia.
__________________
This edit signature thingy is seriously hard to find
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Beyond the ArielHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio
Wiki