miniAMP sound quality - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Commercial Sector > Manufacturers > miniDSP

miniDSP Low cost, modular Digital Signal Processor (DSP) kits for the DIYer from miniDSP.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th October 2010, 11:57 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
otto88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Default miniAMP sound quality

Who has compared the miniAMP to other amps, and can comment on the sound quality (and through what speakers)?
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th October 2010, 08:15 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
I've been wondering about this as well, but if MiniDSP documents which chip's used on the board I'm not spotting where. Neither am I finding any threads which mention it or pics of the board without the heatsink on. But from the specs, supply voltage, and shape of the heatsink my guess is it might be a TAS5601.

Tony, could you comment?
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2010, 01:40 AM   #3
minidsp is offline minidsp  Hong Kong
diyAudio Member
 
minidsp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
The IC used for miniAMP is from the purepath series.. TAS5704 it is.
__________________
www.minidsp.com - Low cost & modular audio DSP kits for DIYers - Follow our tweets @ minidsp
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2010, 03:50 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Ah, thanks. Datasheet's here for folks who are interested.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2010, 04:52 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
otto88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Thanks guys.

I had a look at PurePath and the TAS5704.

Totally different architecture and output, but the question is, how the harmonic distortion pattern (2 – 3 – 4 – 5HD) compares to the National based “chip amps”, eg LM3886, or even LME49713
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2010, 05:27 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Don't forget slew rate, GBP, PSRR, CMRR, and that while harmonic masking applies to THD it's not particularly relevant to IMD. Assuming a source with sufficient drive current, the 49713 beats everything I know of except the 49990 (though SEOs based on either op amp will generally performance limit on the output devices). However, that's a somewhat unfair comparison as it's tough to build one SEO channel for the price of the MiniAmp, much less four and the glue logic to attach to a MiniDSP---after all, a BOM of USD 5 per channel is insufficient to buy a single 49713 in DIY quantities.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quality Control differences = variations in sound quality? KT Class D 3 4th June 2014 12:02 AM
Level-dependend Sound Quality by certainly Bass Drivers - very bad sound at low level tiefbassuebertr Subwoofers 11 3rd March 2012 10:54 AM
Level-dependend Sound Quality by certainly Bass Drivers - very bad sound at low level tiefbassuebertr Multi-Way 1 2nd April 2010 04:12 AM
Better Sound Quality LqDFx Car Audio 14 16th June 2006 04:49 PM
Sound quality,which is best? Richard.C Chip Amps 10 23rd August 2004 07:58 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2