|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| miniDSP Low cost, modular Digital Signal Processor (DSP) kits for the DIYer from miniDSP. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#391 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Michigan
|
Very informative thread and subject. I've been looking for the best active crossover to use in my 3-way system, and as a tool for future speaker systems. I pretty much decided to go for the Behringer DCX 2496. Then I kept reading references to the miniDSP. Well my original decision has gone to shi*!
It looks like that's a good thing after sifting through all of the miniDSP information here and at the website. This will be my first venture into active and the user interface appears very well laid out and easy to use. I'm planning to go with the 4 x 10 hd which will be well suited to my goals. I do have a few questions though. 1. Is a remote included or do I need to get a learning remote for it? 2. Is this unit capable of automatically adjusting channels for time alignment? 3. Does the 4x10 Crossover V1plug-in allow for displaying measurements with a microphone? There are no deal breakers regarding my questions, just want a little heads up.
__________________
Nikko Alpha 650/SAE 2600/SAE 2400/Soundcraftsmen MA5002/Heathkit AA-1800/Heathkit AA-1600 |
|
|
|
#392 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HICKSVILLE TN
|
I want to know how the volume control works(if it just lowers the digital input that is bad!.. with a modded dcx you don't lose the resolution when u run the output down since it's in in the analog domain with the 3318 chipset..( ie rowland, coda, and other use this in their high end preamps) iuse a mix of high and low gain pro amps and consumer amps the dcx let me marry those easily enuff. until i see a noise test of a mixed minidsp with the volume control im gonna hold off replacing my behringer..
|
|
|
|
#393 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, WA.
|
A digital control is not necessarily bad.....if gain structure in the rest of the systems is understood and well considered. There's a good article by "pano" right here on DIYaudio.com that will probably help to baseline your knowledge on these issues.
If only gadgets with an analog volume control are within your consideration, then you've narrowed the field considerably. ![]() Cheers, Dave. Last edited by Davey; 9th February 2013 at 07:09 PM. |
|
|
|
#394 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HICKSVILLE TN
|
I Understand gain structure quite well. I have been doing pro audio for 20+ yrs..
but if the digital volume control drops bits..or is pre dac the you lose resolution.. remember the first digtial tascam mixing consoles? the digital volume control shoud be done in the CPU (ie foobar, Jmedia or any of the other aftermarket media players) or after the dac, in the analog section to maintain the maximum 24 bit word depth input into the dac. again lowering the digital input is BAD! lowering the bit level in the processor is good! so how does the mini dsp work?> |
|
|
|
#395 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HICKSVILLE TN
|
I Understand gain structure quite well. I have been doing pro audio for 20+ yrs..
but if the digital volume control drops bits..or is pre dac the you lose resolution.. remember the first digtial tascam mixing consoles? the digital volume control shoud be done in the CPU (ie foobar, Jmedia or any of the other aftermarket media players) or after the dac, in the analog section to maintain the maximum 24 bit word depth input into the dac. again lowering the digital input is BAD! lowering the bit level in the processor is good! so how does the mini dsp work?> |
|
|
|
#396 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
miniDSP master volume control works in the digital domain. It is done after all the processing in the DSP (depending on the DSP 28/56bit int or 32bit float). I did some measurements and at -60dB THD+N isn't seriously affected. If you need more attenuation for normal listening levels your gain structure should be improved.
|
|
|
|
#397 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Hello.. Maybe I need the idiots guide to miniDSP integration because for some reason I can not wrap my head around how to integrate the mini DSP in my home theatre / audio setup. I can't even figure out the best unit to use. I have read the entire miniDSP manual and then the entire REW manual referred to by the miniDSP, which only made my confusion worse as the REW manual doesn't even mention the DSP anywhere in the manual !!
My main goal is to balance out the frequency response of the main speakers and possibly the center. I have tried using the program built into the yamaha as well as the denon before it but it ends up sounding like someone threw a wet blanket over the sound. Kind of like it is forcing everything down to the least common denominator. I would greatly appreciate it if you could tell me: 1. The best unit to use for my application 2. what other equipment I will need. mic, plug in, 3rd party like REW ? 3. Where in line to hook it up. Thank you for your input Here is a diagram of my equipment layout |
|
|
|
#398 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HICKSVILLE TN
|
OK DEFINE SERIOUS..
MY ANALOG SYSTEYM DOESN'T TRUNCATE BITS OR REDUCE THE S/N RATION THAT IS MY POINT I JUST WANT A STRAIGHT FORWARD ANSWER |
|
|
|
#399 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
Quote:
And using all 24 bits on input to the DAC is redundant anyway, the reason why 24 bit is nice is because you can freely chop away lots of bits without loosing information and not that you need them all at full signal. Last edited by OllBoll; 13th February 2013 at 05:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#400 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HICKSVILLE TN
|
DUH FULL VOLUME.. WE ARE TALKING AT LESS THAN FULL OUTPUT LEVELS
I CAN INPUT 24/96 BUT IS YOU ARE PROCESSING 32 BIT YOU HAVE 8 MORE BITS TO USE : doing it 1st thing in teh DSP makes no sense at all scaling juts before I2S out is the logical thing to do if not, you might lose dynamic ramge within the DSP, as you have to do all kinds of up.down scaling for filters etc |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Utter novice looking for answers to easy questions: | shnaggletooth | Tubes / Valves | 24 | 23rd August 2009 09:10 AM |
| simple questions, can't find the answers | pjaneiro | Multi-Way | 14 | 8th August 2007 10:28 AM |
| #halojoy - Answers DIY audio questions In Person | halojoy | Everything Else | 1 | 10th August 2003 01:52 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |