diyAudio - View Profile: abraxalito
Go Back   Home > Forums > Members List

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving

abraxalito abraxalito is online now

diyAudio Member


Total Posts
General Information
  • Last Activity: Today 10:17 AM
  • Join Date: 19th September 2007

Contact Info

Instant Messaging
Send an Instant Message to abraxalito Using...
Home Page
This Page


Latest Blog Entry

Posted 25th September 2015 at 01:56 PM by abraxalito Comments 0
Since I figured out the reason for needing all those caps in my earlier DAC designs was all brought on by using passive I/V, I'm now a total convert of active I/V in order to do away with the sheer bulk.

Having tried single transistor I/V and loved it, I found there was still some improvement to be gained by biassing the common-base transistor with additional current sources to reduce its input impedance. Since getting down to the region of 1ohm would require some 25mA of bias which isn't well suited to portable applications I decided to have a go at using feedback to obtain the impedance I'm seeking.

I'm not using an off-the-peg CFB amp because they still turn out to be fairly power supply quality susceptible (subjectively speaking) so here's a design I hope that greatly reduces the supply impedance requirements so that it can be used in a portable player.

The picture shows the second prototype I/V stage, coupled to a 6th order Chebyshev anti-imaging...

Posted 20th September 2015 at 11:54 PM by abraxalito Comments 7
I've been getting a lot of use out of Simon Bramble's webpage for designing active filters recently - Its a great resource.

Right down at the bottom of the page the last filter he shows the schematic of is a 9th order Chebyshev, 1dB ripple, with a corner frequency of 1kHz. A textbook frequency response plot is obtained using LTC6241s. I latched on to this and tried changing the corner frequency to 18kHz, wondering if I could use such a design for an anti-imaging filter for my DACs. So I divided all the capacitor values by 18 and ran the sim. Disaster! The frequency response I obtained is below - a 7dB spike at 17kHz.

The problem seems to be inadequate Q - high order filters are composed of sections which increase in Q (more positive feedback) and the chosen opamps aren't fast enough (18MHz GBW). I went to a faster opamp for the highest Q stage which brought about some improvement...

Posted 14th September 2015 at 01:19 PM by abraxalito Comments 0
Posted in Uncategorized
I bought this amp because the case attracted me - no pics on the Taobao page were giving away anything about the insides, quite unusual. After receiving it I couldn't resist having a quick listen and it turns out its a hardwired tone control with bass and treble turned up to the max, about +16dB wrt 1.3kHz. What a surprise! - no matter as I was going to strip out the innards anyway to use as a test platform for my amp.

Posted 10th September 2015 at 01:28 AM by abraxalito Comments 0
Posted in Uncategorized
In my search for opamps with better real-world PSRR behaviour, I came across this beauty. For now I'll just post up its simplified schematic and PSRR plot - if any of you know of it please put your deduction in the comments. I may add more clues later if nobody nails it early on.

The reason I find this part interesting is its cascoded output stage - I believe this is what leads to the 'hump' in the positive rail PSRR. I've never seen that behaviour on any other device.

Well over a hundred views now and not one single stab at the answer. Its the industrial-strength version of the now obsolete LM308, a Bob Widlar special with super-beta input stage. The output stage cascode I take it isn't primarily to improve the PSRR rather its due to the high maximum operating voltage (72V). TI does still have the DS on its website though it doesn't put in an appearance in parametric search as its been obsolete for a while. Even more interesting is its decompensated variant which...

Posted 28th August 2015 at 04:38 AM by abraxalito Comments 0
Posted in Uncategorized
Since acquiring and modding my Taobao headphone amp I've been enamoured of creating a much more portable headphone solution to deliver aural nirvana but on the move. Whereas transformers are a very practical solution for a desktop amp, steel and copper is not only bulky but also jolly heavy and hence a no-no for anything pocket-sized.

How else to get the dynamics I'm seeking though? For these amps I'm toying with different solutions to getting better PSRR, particularly in the all-important bass region which tends to suffer in commercial portable amps. The OPS (output stage) is what needs most attention in any classAB amp - the signal stages can all be classA but for efficiency (and hence battery life) the output stage can't be conducting all the time.

A fully discrete output stage where the output devices are cascoded looks to be one solution but initially I'm looking for a simpler, more cost-effective solution with lower overhead on the supplies if possible....
Recent Comments
I realize that gain...
Posted 24th September 2015 at 11:17 PM by abraxalito abraxalito is online now
Also, if you want to...
Posted 24th September 2015 at 03:56 PM by CharlieLaub CharlieLaub is offline
Gain is not required...
Posted 24th September 2015 at 03:42 PM by CharlieLaub CharlieLaub is offline
Perhaps we have different...
Posted 24th September 2015 at 01:41 AM by abraxalito abraxalito is online now
Well I wouldn't use...
Posted 24th September 2015 at 12:25 AM by CharlieLaub CharlieLaub is offline
Hide this!Advertise here!

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:32 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2015 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2