A12P F.A.S.T - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Commercial Sector > Manufacturers > Markaudio

Markaudio Designers and builders of audiophile grade drivers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th March 2013, 09:14 AM   #11
Toppsy is offline Toppsy  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lancashire, England
ctrevith wrote
Quote:
What's the sense at this point of how the Peerless HDS matches with the A12P?
You'd have to ask Scottmoose direct that question as he designed the woofer boxes and chose the peerless to match with the A12P performance. Though the Peerless is a little down on SPL over the A12P this is not an issue as the Plate amp has an independant volume control so we simple dial in a volume to match the A12P. At present I have 2-sets of speaker leads from each my monobloc 300B power amps. One set of leads goes to the Peerless driver via the plate amp the other set direct to the A12P. So we are driving the A12P full range and limiting the output of the Perrless via the variable crossover and volume controls.

zman01 wrote
Quote:
Colin,

Any updates on how the speakers are playing?
Hi Zia, Not a lot to report really. I have been driving the Peerless woofers with some generated low level tones via my CD player on constant repeat to help free up the drivers. However, I did invite a mate over the other week for his views on the set up where we played around with varying XO points and volume settings on the woofers on a range of music. The only conclussion we came to was the need to measure the output of the speakers with regards a full range frequency sweep to try to establish any peaks and troughs to help decide the best XO point. This aint gonna be an easy build, wire up and play speaker, much to do there is young skywalker, to coin a phrase.

So for now I have moved on to other 'in the pipeline' projects and will report back on these when my mate Andrew comes down from Scotland with some measuring equipment and hopefully get these proper sorted, like.

Zia you have PM regards that other project we have been corresponding.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2013, 08:13 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Toppsy,

Wow! That is exactly what I was looking to do, I was planning on modifying my Super Pensils as I am not too happy with the low freq. resp.

Do you have any plans or build list?

Well done!
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2013, 05:45 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
No, it was a one-off I did for Colin which we both decided didn't work all that well. Level matching was a royal pain in the neck since they were sub units meant to be used with the vented box mains (for simplicity when prototyping, Colin built the boxes as one unit) & we never could get the two legs consistently blended. I think the boxes ended up being recycled. If you're going down the 2-way route, do yourself a favour and make it a proper 2-way. But you'll need LF drivers with a decent high end, & fairly substantial component values if you go speaker-level passive.
__________________
Community site www.frugal-horn.com Commercial site www.wodendesign.com

Last edited by Scottmoose; 6th December 2013 at 05:47 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2013, 06:13 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Bob Brines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
I went the dedicated sub route. I can report that the results are very good indeed. And I still have a lot of options that haven't been explored.

The sub I chose is the Dayton RS315HF-4, a 12" aluminum cone driver that will take much more power that is likely to match A10's. In a Q=.7 sealed box it will do 95dB@20Hz and 250w. I suspect they are usable to 500Hz, but that is not an issue since the XO has to be outside the telephone band. I am driving them with a Dayton APA-150, 75w/ch which is plenty to produce 70-80dB ad 2.5m. I currently have them crossed a 200Hz LR24.

I cannot see how proper integration top/bottom can be accomplished without DSP. The XO needs to be rather sharp and, since the subs are side-firing, there is a time delay that has to be corrected.

Bob
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2013, 06:21 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Brines View Post
I went the dedicated sub route. I can report that the results are very good indeed. And I still have a lot of options that haven't been explored.

The sub I chose is the Dayton RS315HF-4, a 12" aluminum cone driver that will take much more power that is likely to match A10's. In a Q=.7 sealed box it will do 95dB@20Hz and 250w. I suspect they are usable to 500Hz, but that is not an issue since the XO has to be outside the telephone band. I am driving them with a Dayton APA-150, 75w/ch which is plenty to produce 70-80dB ad 2.5m. I currently have them crossed a 200Hz LR24.

I cannot see how proper integration top/bottom can be accomplished without DSP. The XO needs to be rather sharp and, since the subs are side-firing, there is a time delay that has to be corrected.

Bob
Maybe I am stupid for having my heart set on staying with a 100% analogue setup without XO. With only 4 watts to work with my options are limited.

That was why using my pre out and then Class D amp with helper woofers with XO and don't XO my A12P's seemed like a reasonable idea...
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2013, 06:40 PM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
Bob Brines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
The whole reason for going FAST is to relieve the A12P's of bass duties. That requires an XO. 4w will be plenty of power for the A12P XO'd above 200Hz or so. If you run the A12P's wide open, 4w is iffy, particularly if you listen to any rock, classic or otherwise. You will then want to XO the woofer at something like 40Hz (MLTL) or 60Hz BR. A Q=.7 sealed box would cross at ~100Hz. I suppose at those low frequencies timing errors would be moot.

One thing that often gets lost is just because a speaker is not producing any sound at low frequencies, doesn't mean that the driver is not trying its best to use that low frequency power. You need the XO to remove unwanted frequencies from the driver.

Bob

Last edited by Bob Brines; 6th December 2013 at 06:44 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2013, 07:27 PM   #17
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
Bob; indeed - and while not specifically addressed in this thread, but currently the subject elsewhere, special cautions need be taken when using drivers such as the 12P in an OB / FAST type arrangement - special as in XO/HP filtering of the wideband drive at frequencies rather much higher than would otherwise be in their comfort zone in a ported or sealed enclosures.

For the 12P, something like 300-400 HZ? - but then of course matching to woofer(s) - not "sub" driver- that blends seamlessly becomes more of an issue.
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you?
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2013, 08:01 PM   #18
diyAudio Member
 
Bob Brines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
Where to cross a FAST pairing depends a lot of the excursion characteristics of the driver/box. In my case, the maximum excusion of the A10P in a BR is in the neighborhood of 100Hz. Crossing at 200Hz is an octave higher, and cone movement is near zero at the F3 point. Crossing any higher would not gain any advantage. The higher the XO, the more likely the phase rotation of the XO will be heard. 300Hz is the generally stated upper limit. By the same token, a tweeter should not be crossed lower that 3kHz -- the telephone band.

I am well aware of the conventional wisdom that the bottom driver should not be a sub, but be a mid-woofer capable of rather high frequencies. 6"-8" drivers are usually recommended. I chose a 12", honest-to-god sub. Based on the FR plot alone, the break-up -classic metal driver spike -- Is above 2kHz. That means that it should be useful to nearly 1kHz. Of course, the polar response would be so narrow that crossing to a dome tweeter would be spectacularly bad. This is not an issue crossing at 200Hz. The polar response is still pretty much hemispheric and I am using two subs, so source location is not a problem.

Do you want a real test of bass/treble integration? Find some music with a lot of 'cello work crossing middle C. This was a major problem with my Goldwood H-baffles. The hand-off sounded awful. Never did straighten it out. My new car with a premium audio system sounds awful for about 1/2 octave. My new subs -- smooth as silk.

Bob
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2013, 10:37 PM   #19
jimbro is offline jimbro  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: somewhere in Texas
How do you find the max excursion frequency?
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2013, 11:14 PM   #20
diyAudio Member
 
Bob Brines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbro View Post
How do you find the max excursion frequency?
You will have to model your driver/cabinet to find this. With BR's and MLTL's, max excursion occurs ~one octave above the resonant frequency. Of course, below resonant frequency, the cabinet unloads and excursion scyrockets, but that is another issue.

Bob
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A12P bezel cover bqc Markaudio 8 18th July 2013 02:47 PM
A12P MLTL's Toppsy Markaudio 25 11th April 2013 04:17 PM
Avebury A12P build bqc Full Range 34 9th November 2012 03:58 PM
Any A12P owners out there? impuls60 Full Range 37 30th October 2012 03:27 PM
A12P break in question - mp9 Markaudio 5 23rd July 2012 08:19 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:51 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2