|18th December 2012, 10:59 PM||#21|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Hi Tux, Bob (fellas).
Following on from the 2 previous posts, you might want to read my last post again as you've sort of "overlooked" the fundamental factor, which is the operation condition of a long stroke, single cone, low mass, single point-source driver. Tux, Bob (et al other experienced Diyers), please remember that many members don't always have your long experience and my email bag grows ever longer.
Its important to better understand the operation of the power-train in this type of driver, as a dual simultaneous output operation; Oscillation (mostly LF) and resonance (MF-HF). These emittance functions can't be isolated from each other. Any potential inference (particularly return wave LF - counter pressure) acting on the rear of the driver, will affect its entire bandwidth output. Micro-resonance emissions with a main carrier wave passing across the cone surface substrate risks being interrupted throughout in the entire output spectrum; And mechanical compression/de-compression of the power-train is also likely to result.
Large thin walled (15-mm MDF) unbraced boxes of the type deployed by Evan and Mr Ning, can affect the operation of the driver. The box will generate a counter oscillation that risks affecting driver operation and No amount of damping will save the box from this lack of stability.
Remember, Markaudio drivers are unusual. They are low mass, long stroke designs with soft compliant suspensions, more bass (LF) capable than most other full-range makes, and a fair number of woof-mids for that matter. Therefore, they are potentially more sensitive to external influences of the types being discussed. For those of you who wish to look at recent independent assessment of this performance aspect of Markaudio drivers, take a look at Matsumoto san' work:
Alpair 10 Gen. 2 Low range performance
As a Mech Eng of some 35 years+ and as a designer maker of drivers, its my job to know what potential external factors can impact on driver operation. Should you want a Markaudio driver to work cleanly within its operational spectrum in a large box of the types deployed by Evan and Mr. Ning - Add some bracing!. I have 4+ years worth of test data relating to counter effects on driver power trains functioning inside sealed and vented boxes. Its commercially sensitive material, maybe next year (when time permits) I could re-work it to make a paper that would be of interest to members.
Bob's point about not using bracing in smaller boxes is reasonable. In mechanical engineering circles, principles of strength and rigidity are well understood, being relative/proportional to size/scale. Small boxes (bookshelf) are usually much less in need of bracing.
Tux, regarding combing, I can appreciate that this phenomenon is audible in the case of several drivers (line arrays for example), but for 2 drivers, its simply not an audible issue for typical room listening situations. I'm with you on keeping to the "purist" side of Full-Rangers. For example, My living room system is pure single point source for 5 boxes (5.0 system -no sub, I get nice bass from the Pensils). But we have accept that Full-Rangers are limited in their power output and twinning CHR's did work really well. Power handling was really decent, so it a great option for those guys wanting to keep their builds simple, while giving themselves a bit more "juice" so to speak. As a maker, I have to do what I can to satisfy the many needs of Diyers as possible.
Naturally, for those members (Diyers) operating FAST and multiple OB systems, assuming the CHR/P or Alpair is somehow isolated from other drivers, counter influences on the Markaudio unit of the type discussed here shouldn't be a issue.
There's always a danger for me, as a maker when publishing tests of the sort that Evan and Mr Ning made. They are simply experimenting and understand the limitations of the MDF material. These guys treat the data from these tests as only "indicative". They use these early tests as a stepping stone to further development. In this instance, I published their work to encourage members and Diyers to experiment. In doing so, we should accept that variations in outcomes is part of the process and results don't always meet expectations. Evan so, I was much encouraged by the potential of these boxes. Scott has I think sent me data for a optimal alignment for a twin driver Pensil design (must search through my email). I'm confident these types of boxes, built properly will work well.
Got to go chaps, ton of work to do.
Last edited by markaudio; 19th December 2012 at 12:36 AM.
|8th January 2013, 02:10 AM||#22|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Any more word on the dual CHR box? That one had me a bit interested.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Cutting plans for Pensil 12 and Super Pensil||zman01||Markaudio||3||24th March 2011 04:48 AM|
|Salvaged transformer Measurments help!||serj.t.s||Power Supplies||9||4th February 2008 02:35 PM|
|my latest project.. FR measurments||mAJORD||Multi-Way||6||8th December 2005 08:46 AM|
|1 channel of MiniA working - measurments||Stabist||Pass Labs||55||8th November 2005 07:51 AM|
|New To Site?||Need Help?|