|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Markaudio Designers and builders of audiophile grade drivers |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
|
I have been working on an MLTL cabinet for the Alpair 10.2 Here is the result. The first picture is my new M10-A10. The second picture is the M10-A10 next to the Pensil 10.2, both in raw plywood. The FR plot is a comparison of the performance of two cabinets. A bit of explanation:
Because I don’t have access to an anechoic chamber, the bottom ends of the graphs are created by combining the driver and port nearfield responses. The top end is a gated 1/2m response. I am now thinking that I spiced the plots slightly wrong and the actual bass response of both cabinets is probably ~2dB less than indicated here. The M10-A10 is the black trace, the Pensil 10.2 is the red trace. The green trace is a crude representation of the published Alpair 10.2 response. The M10-A10 and the Pensil 10.2 perform pretty much the same, other than the unbraced sides of the Pensil produce enough noise to screw up imaging. (This was a short cut that I took to get the boxes together quickly – I had them running in two days. I will probably run some dowels through the sides and veneer them for sale sometime in the future.) So why do a new design? It is a matter of design philosophy. I suspect that Scott’s design was driven by ultimate ease of construction. The cabinet is highly resonant and uses a LOT of stuffing to produce a reasonable output. My approach uses all of the tools to reduce all resonances except the fundamental with a minimum of stuffing – the cabinet is lined with fiberglass but uses no stuffing per se. The result is a cabinet that is somewhat taller and much less bulky. The end result of either approach is a very fine sounding speaker. Which is better? Well, if you are asking me…. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: somewhere in Texas
|
Very nice looking speaker Bob. Good work as usual. I'd like to hear your impressions of the 10.2 vs 7.3.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dhaka
|
Happy New Year Bob!
Those are handsome looking speakers (as usual from you!). Is the supra baffle a must or that is mainly an aesthetic function? Some listening impressions on different genres and in comparison to your A 7.3 and TB W8 design would be welcome. -Zia p.s. OT - Maybe too early to ask, but would you be designing a cab for the upcoming Alp 12.3? Last edited by zman01; 1st January 2012 at 05:22 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Hello Bob,
Happy New Year! Very interesting project. Wish I could be with you listening to these speakers. I've PhotoShoped your pic to help focus on its design and look using both grey and gold drivers. Cheers Mark. Last edited by markaudio; 1st January 2012 at 08:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
|
Interesting, Mark. The gold driver does look good against the dark wood. Of course, assuming that I can sell some of these, I’ll use whatever the customer wants!
The veneer I used will not be repeated. It is beech, which I had from a customer who changed his mind about veneers. I don’t particularly like the broad and prominent grain. On top of that, it blotched somewhat when I applied the stain. If I need a dark brown wood, I’ll use either natural walnut or teak. I redid the FR chart for the M10-A10. Here is the result: Graph 1: Gray=ungated 1/2m. Black=combined nearfield + gated 1/2m. Red=10*. Blue=15*. Green=20*. Graph 2: Gray=ungated 1/2m. Black=combined nearfield + gated 1/2m. Red=15*. Blue=30*. Green=45*. Brown=60* Graph 3: Impedance. Bob |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Nice work Bob! Ive run both gen.1 and 2 with good results, no doubt you have rung the last drop of bass performance from these great drivers! Will you be offering plans for these on your site, if so I'll be waiting in line for my set!
Larry |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
|
Quote:
I have the plans available now, but the new page will not be on the web site for a few days. PM me. Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
|
Quote:
Quote:
-Zia Quote:
Bob |
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
|
Can you please tell a little bit more why the pensil is highly resonant and the M10-A10 not?
Nice build! Mark |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Bob, I think you might have misspelled the beech - even with a "natural" finish, not one of my favorites - now flat sliced/book matched black walnut is a different story
nice work on the MLTLs as always C
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Bookshelf Cabinet for Alpair 10 (Gen 2) | Musik007 | Twin Audio | 9 | 10th September 2011 02:43 PM |
| Cabinet design alpair 10 | Ewald | Full Range | 7 | 11th February 2011 09:19 AM |
| Alpair 12en in BIBen cabinet or Alpair 7 in fonken w/subs | tripathdude | Full Range | 1 | 7th November 2010 05:04 AM |
| Alpair 10 Bass + Alpair 5 - Woodwill Japan | markaudio | Markaudio | 16 | 26th January 2010 11:48 AM |
| Alpair 10 wide bass driver and Alpair 10 Fullrange | _henry_ | Full Range | 71 | 15th March 2009 11:37 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13717 seconds (83.15% PHP - 16.85% MySQL) with 11 queries |