Go Back   Home > Forums > Commercial Sector > Manufacturers > Markaudio

Markaudio Designers and builders of audiophile grade drivers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th September 2011, 08:55 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Default Woden Design (Wessex ML-TL) Aluminum Cabinet ?

Hello, Im new to the speaker design world so please bear with me... I am looking at the Dual Driver, CHR-70, Wessex ML-TL cabinet design with the drivers mounted on the short side as in page two (left side) here: http://homepage.mac.com/tlinespeaker...v92-151209.pdf

I am looking to keep the same design, however, I want the front and back to be 5.5" with a curved 2.25" radius. I will keep the exact same height 43.5" and adjust the depth of the cabinet to match the total volume. Is this a feasable change to the design? Just looking into my options as my material limits the box dimensions slightly. I have both 1/2" and 3/8" stock and want a curved front and back. I have included a top view for a better understanding.

Thanks - I am completely impressed with this forum and the Mark Audio Support...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg top view speaker draft.jpg (44.6 KB, 174 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2011, 09:10 PM   #2
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
The critical parameters are internal height, cross-section, vent size & distance from the bottom, and (average) driver distance from the top (with 2 facing the same way as close as possible). You can change cross-section shape as long as you don't get a severe aspect ratio or change the area. I did similar when i morped Scott's EL166 ML-TL to make out MTM FAST. When we finish playing with the design we will add some biggish champhers to the sides.

Click the image to open in full size.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2011, 09:38 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Dave, very cool, thanks for the fast response. I am assuming the cross sectional change is not too severe, I am keeping the same internal height, port size and speaker height placement as the original. My other concern was the curved front and back portions and any problems that may arise due to that change.

-Tom
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Collated Design Criteria/dimensions for Ariel ML-TL Design talsius Full Range 1 13th October 2011 05:28 AM
Can anyone help TL or ML-TL for Alpair 10 _henry_ Full Range 3 31st December 2008 06:31 AM
What's the difference between a TL, a ML-TL and a TQWT? Bricolo Multi-Way 82 28th August 2008 02:17 PM
ML-TL or ML-TQWT with very low Qt driver Henkjan Full Range 6 29th September 2006 02:29 PM
Small box for FE103 - ML TL or ML TQWT? ChuckT Full Range 15 28th July 2004 05:56 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:10 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2