Thanks for your insight Dave, very interesting. The perennial problem with DIY audio is we have to take a leap of faith, sniffing out what we think might work for us from what we have learned before. I'm off piste in the full range world here and enjoying it, but as usual asking questions produces more questions than answers.
Its treble purity between the Alpairs that I'd like to know more about. Lispy and phasey HF is what turns me off more than anything. If you can give your impressions there, I'd be grateful!
Its treble purity between the Alpairs that I'd like to know more about. Lispy and phasey HF is what turns me off more than anything. If you can give your impressions there, I'd be grateful!
Alpair 7
Simon,
I have been experimenting with the Alpair 7s and they're really quite nice. I have not heard the 10.2s. I still have not committed to a box yet but I'm leaning toward Dave's/Scott's Wide Classic GR dMar-Ken7. I've built boxes out of cardboard and they image like bandits, are clean and transparent, with exceptional detail and tonality. I love 'em. The top end is quite satisfactory. I think top end quality and extension has a lot to do with the amp as well (maybe more than driver). One of the best I've heard was done by Greenvalve Audio. It's a 417A RC VT-25 (10, 10Y, 801A) amp that uses fixed bias, mercury vapor rectification and russian 6c45p as a driver. Only 1 watt or so though.
Search YouTube for "Greenvalve Audio Latest" and "Greenvalve Audio introducing the Luddite 210 tube amp."
Jim
Simon,
I have been experimenting with the Alpair 7s and they're really quite nice. I have not heard the 10.2s. I still have not committed to a box yet but I'm leaning toward Dave's/Scott's Wide Classic GR dMar-Ken7. I've built boxes out of cardboard and they image like bandits, are clean and transparent, with exceptional detail and tonality. I love 'em. The top end is quite satisfactory. I think top end quality and extension has a lot to do with the amp as well (maybe more than driver). One of the best I've heard was done by Greenvalve Audio. It's a 417A RC VT-25 (10, 10Y, 801A) amp that uses fixed bias, mercury vapor rectification and russian 6c45p as a driver. Only 1 watt or so though.
Search YouTube for "Greenvalve Audio Latest" and "Greenvalve Audio introducing the Luddite 210 tube amp."
Jim
Thanks Dave for sharing the listening impressions.
You never build any Pensil 12s? 🙂
Simon,
IMHO the questions and curiosity, testing out of theories, trying things out by yourself, failures, success (and vindication, major and minor) are all part of what DIY audio so much fun.
Even after a set of questions are answered, probably a new set will turn up in your head! 🙂
-Zia
You never build any Pensil 12s? 🙂
The perennial problem with DIY audio is we have to take a leap of faith, sniffing out what we think might work for us from what we have learned before.
Simon,
IMHO the questions and curiosity, testing out of theories, trying things out by yourself, failures, success (and vindication, major and minor) are all part of what DIY audio so much fun.
Even after a set of questions are answered, probably a new set will turn up in your head! 🙂
-Zia
I think top end quality and extension has a lot to do with the amp as well (maybe more than driver).
I agree Jim, I've toiled long and hard to rid my replay chain of digititus, HF grit and grain.. I don't want to give that up.
Zia, of course its why I'm here, you sure don't save any time or money DIYing! It's the journey that's fun.
Top-End Extension of Alpair 7
The ultimate test instruments for me are my wife and young children. I just played some cuts for them with a good amount of top-end work and they all sat for quite some time captivated (rare). Wife's comments were, "It's crystal clear and smooth." I described some words to her like "shimmer" and "decay" and she agreed. Sounds lifelike. I have no complaints.
Now, my olds Altecs with 811B horns and a little Hendirx will keep them from setting foot in the house 😉! Vinyl's a bit more forgiving but they still run from the room. Those are used for home theater now. I have another pair that are modified with wood horns, etc, which are MUCH nicer.
To me, the Alpair 7s are all about finesse.
Jim
The ultimate test instruments for me are my wife and young children. I just played some cuts for them with a good amount of top-end work and they all sat for quite some time captivated (rare). Wife's comments were, "It's crystal clear and smooth." I described some words to her like "shimmer" and "decay" and she agreed. Sounds lifelike. I have no complaints.
Now, my olds Altecs with 811B horns and a little Hendirx will keep them from setting foot in the house 😉! Vinyl's a bit more forgiving but they still run from the room. Those are used for home theater now. I have another pair that are modified with wood horns, etc, which are MUCH nicer.
To me, the Alpair 7s are all about finesse.
Jim
To me, the Alpair 7s are all about finesse.
Jim has it here.
Simon,
None of the gen 2 Alpairs (A7, A10.2, A12) i have heard have any hint of the edgy weirdness in the HF that bugged me about the 1ast set of JX92S i had (i called them unlistenable -- the set i have now are better), or that the G1 Alpairs had a hint of. This is a faukt that doesn't seem to be an issue with most people.
Do note that most of my listening has been with treated drivers, and, at least in the G1 Alpair (and CHR) treatment i apply was able to reduce or kill the top end issues mentioned above.
dave
You never build any Pensil 12s? 🙂
I wish we were in a position to build everything. Out own boxes are most important to us (since some of the plans cost money we need to make sure they work).
Besides resources to build the box, i dislike having boxes with no drivers. We also already end up too many development boxes, and rarely get enuff or them to cover costs (when they do sell, anyone wants a really good value on a set of speakers come on up the mountain and do some shopping)
dave
Thanks
Thank you. Just experimenting.
Note, the small bookshelves will provide "just about" adequate bass in a small room. I'd say 180 sq. ft. to 150 sq ft. or less.
Big rooms need not apply.
Thank you. Just experimenting.
Note, the small bookshelves will provide "just about" adequate bass in a small room. I'd say 180 sq. ft. to 150 sq ft. or less.
Big rooms need not apply.
Thank you. Just experimenting.
Note, the small bookshelves will provide "just about" adequate bass in a small room. I'd say 180 sq. ft. to 150 sq ft. or less.
Big rooms need not apply.
FWIW there's probably a lot more folks in that category than with 6000cu ft rooms, so the little baby bookshelves still have their niche.
than with 6000cu ft rooms
My room is on the order of 10,000 ft^3, (~850 ft^2 floorspace) so if it produces adequate bass in my room it is more than likely to provide adequate bass in a smaller room.
My office on the other hand is ~800 ft^3 (100 ft^2 floorspace) and i am happy with the bass provided by a set of millis (usually FE127eN or EL70eN)
Chris' 3 rooms all fit in between these 2, so by shuffling speakers around we get a good handle on the effects of room volume.
dave
usually FE127eN or EL70eN
dave
Dave or Anyone?
What does eN stands for? Is it some short form of the metallic alloy used in the magnet motors?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Full Range
- Alpair selection...