|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Denmark
|
Dear Markaudio. From you first post, I understand you can control the thickness of the cone in the neck area? Is that true? I thougt the cone bas made, by pouring paper pult onto a net, and that way the cone will be equally thick all over the cone?
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Princeton B.C.
|
Is there an MA driver the same as the CSS EL-70?
Another unrelated question: is there a dealer in the Philippines for MA speaker drivers? |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
- not really-(and a bone of contention for some
) - of the MA drivers with nominally same cone diameter, the Alpair7.3 is vastly more refined, resolving, and less forgiving of compromised upstream components, and neither of the other current paper cones that size ( CHP70 / CHBW70) have the HF response of the EL70If the Alpair6P went 10-15Hz lower .........
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
6p has the classic vintage sound nailed ... it is a bit soft on the top, the 6p would need to go at least 30 Hz lower to equal the EL70 LF response -- only the A10.2 goes lower.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Princeton B.C.
|
Thanks for the info. So reading in this forum i have read some comments by MA that there is a fear of abusing or over driving his fr drivers. I think it might be due to the fact they sound so good but give me more; volume, involvement? So maybe too much to expect from a single 4"but can a bigger,stronger driver be a solution 5-6" or 2 4" per side? Not heavy bass augmentation but more volume with the same finesse.
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
The A10.2 seems to meet the needs of a lot of people. That might be worth investigating.
__________________
Sent from my tricorder. |
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
at the risk of censure - more volume and bass extension than 7.3 , yes - "finesse" in the upper mids/top, maybe not
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
Personally I don't really understand why one should have x (insert number) of somewhat by a small margin different drivers?
For me it would makes more sense to do it the (Apple way). It should reduce costs as well. 1. One driver for fullrange for a big room 2. One driver for fullrange for a small room 3. One driver that would work as a midtweeter in a "Fast" system. And that's it. Put the energy, focus and therefor cost on three drivers instead of x numbers would make much more sense in my view. /Jacozz |
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
What about my suggestion?
Make a sandwich of paper and alu? Best of two worlds? (At least in theory) /Jacozz |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Markaudio CHR-70: Amplifier options? | mkbrooks | Chip Amps | 10 | 15th June 2011 02:46 PM |
| FS: pair of MarkAudio CHR-70 drivers | albireo13 | Swap Meet | 5 | 30th November 2010 08:07 PM |
| Alpair 6P Gen. 2 (paper) introduction | markaudio | Markaudio | 21 | 20th November 2010 02:10 AM |
| My first build! MarkAudio CHR-70 in da house | tresch | Full Range | 38 | 31st August 2009 10:07 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |