Mark's proto 6.5" Woofer, 1" silk Tweet combo - Page 26 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Commercial Sector > Manufacturers > Markaudio

Markaudio Designers and builders of audiophile grade drivers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th April 2012, 10:05 PM   #251
jimbro is offline jimbro  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: somewhere in Texas
Hi Mark - looks like woof 6.2 should still work with tweet 3 (ert26)?
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2012, 04:07 AM   #252
diyAudio Member
 
markaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisb View Post
since this is your forum, you're able to control the "warmer" replies (mine included if need be), but I think the operative word in above post is "claim"

is there an emoticon for "can o' worms" or "$hit-disturber"? damwell should be


I just so happen to have the spec sheets for Alpair10.2 (which is quite growing on me, but still not yet as favorite as the 7.3 or EL70) and a 12" (which I've not yet heard) by maker famous for their OEM/DIY/musical instrument models - very interesting . Aside from the 12's approx 10dB difference in nominal power band sensitivity, 4dB rise in the 600-6K range, and 10times power handling which one would be surprised not to find in this type of driver, what's most interesting in closer inspection of the TSP and FR graph is the only approx 3 dB difference from 300Hz down; with the Alpair's built in BSC, almost identical Xmax, and 10Hz lower Fs extending the little guy's "anechoic" F10 almost a full octave lower than the 12"

horses for courses of course
Hi Chris,
Apologies, I missed reading this post. I try not to control any of the replies. Only those that are a tad over-hostile or misleading push into delete mode.

Get your drift, sadly the commercial market (woofs etc) can be shall we say "over generous" with published specs. I'm on record for making this criticism of my industry. Alas, any woof I make must compete and rest assured, I'll do honest anechoic tests as accurate as possible.

We could recall that Markaudio drivers do differ in their design from "commercial" drivers. We are pushing the envelop design on low mass cones, wide compliance suspensions and light long stroke coils etc,; a long way off from the traditional drivers. But we should also bear in mind that power-handling on Markaudio designs has to be lighter while traditional designed drivers may offer more loading. However, I when I look at some of the power-handling claims made by some makers, they are "optimistic" (putting it mildly).

Cheers
Mark.

Last edited by markaudio; 25th April 2012 at 04:09 AM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone tried "hello proto" PCB service? neutron7 Parts 20 30th December 2006 04:01 PM
6.5" silver flute with 1 1/8" dayton silk dome tweeter jadenlinkletter Multi-Way 10 28th February 2006 07:20 AM
Anyone design a system with the Dynavox 28mm tweet and 6.5" woofer? JCoffey Multi-Way 0 21st April 2005 02:26 PM
WTB: Focal & Audiom & Volts 11", 12", 13", 15" woofer gengis Swap Meet 0 17th March 2005 02:29 AM
Dayton 6" reference and dayton silk dome tweeter combo project...input? nerd of nerds Multi-Way 4 2nd December 2004 05:36 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:17 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2