New Youtube video tutorial: measuring a 0.001 Ohm shunt

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Interesting experiment. If the uncertainty of your bias is greater than the bias itself, how do you justify subtracting only the bias from the result, when really a 6 sigma on that measurement would be +/- 0.2 mOhm - and then why so many significant figures? It would be interesting to see a histogram of your shunt test to see if it is a truly normal distribution, etc.
 
Dear Sir:

First, I want to thank you for taking the time to watch my video, and I
also appreciate your feedback.

You are correct, I put this experiment together in a hurry just to show

that an old HP/Agilent 3457A could get the job done. (But NOT in a

production environment, it's probably TOO time consuming for that, although

with the HPIB/GPIB interface, we can speed up the process considerably)

I used a 2.25mm cooper plate to produce the closed thing to a real short

that I have ever been able to produce.


Yes, I was using significant figures that could not be justified.

And yes, it would be interesting so see if the data points fall in perfect

"bell type" distribution. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the raw data

from the experiment (the 200 samples used to compute the mean and

standard deviation) This was a "stand alone" experiment, no external

computer used to log the data. If more people request that I perform the

experiment again to dump the raw data to an external computer (maybe

generate an Excel spreadsheet) and get the actual distribution, I will consider

it.

In the mean time, stay tune for the release of part 2 in which I repeat the

experiment but in a completely different way (I don't want to give away the

ending)
 
Dear Sir:

First, thanks for watching my video and providing feedback.

You are correct, I put this experiment in a hurry just to show that an old HP/Agilent 3457A could get the job done.

Yes, the number of significant figures shown, is not appropriate I will take that into

consideration. Regarding the distribution of the data, this was a "stand alone" experiment

with no external computer to collect the raw data.

If more users requested, I will repeat the experiment but this time I will dump all the

raw to an external file which can be used to create an Excel spreadsheet.


In the mean time please stay tuned for part 2 in which I will repeat the experiment but

using a completely different procedure(I don't want to give the ending away)

Again thank you,

Juliorz
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.