Sound Quality Vs. Measurements

Status
Not open for further replies.
dvv said:
when I tune to a local FM station, I get some wonderful LF transients which I barely hear, but I can see the bass membrane pushing air like crazy.
Does the tuner have AFC? Most older (i.e. non-synthesised) tuners have this to prevent drifting off frequency. Snag is that AFC is a feedback loop, which if poorly designed can have subsonic response peaks - and may even boost low audio frequencies.
 
diyAudio Member RIP
Joined 2005
Good news , I guess most would fear such a test , well anything that would make most amplifiers sweat ...:)

I had the need of a very cheap multichannel amp a couple years ago and bought a discontinued Best Buy in-house brand off the floor at my local store. It was a hoot to lift the hood and see the size of the mains transformer and the teeny bulk caps. I also cringed as I saw who made it for them, Inkel, a Korean firm that is notorious for various good reasons. Suffice it to say this amp would likely produce some pathological powercube graphs, particularly if one attempted to drive all channels at once.

What puzzles me is who might be left in the vast Harman empire who knows how to design non-switching amps. The company has been IMO on a downward spiral of truly ghastly proportions, with the occasional glimmer of hope here and there, since a CEO with no audio experience whatsoever took over, moved corporate HQ to Connecticut and replaced all of his direct reports. The company has since shed a plethora of talented people. Whatever issues one may have had with Sidney Harman, people used to say we could do a lot worse. They are being vindicated in that judgment! So it goes. Of course we have Bose and Monster et al. to compare to, which makes the situation seem less bad I suppose.
 
Harmon had an PhD in social psychology , i have always felt , if i had to do it all over again , this was the way to go in business and politics .. :) IYO what was the best era for Harmon products .....?

To the best of my knowledge, Dr Sidney Harman has graduated electronics in the days of DC electronics, just as the late Bernard Kardon did. According to his own words, Dr Harman couldn't be bothered to get into AC electronics, so he took up leading the company, while Bernard Kardon took over the engineering side.

In 1958, they invented the world's first stereo receiver. After that, they simply pursued the wide bandwidth philosophy of Bernard Kardon, actually employing Prof Dr Matti Otala for around 7 or 8 years. It is said that the one and only Citation XX amp, said to be able to deliver 500 Amps of current in short peaks, was actually made under Otala's strong influence.

Harman/Kardon Citation XX on thevintageknob.org

As for myself, I admit to having swallowed their philosophy hook, sink and fishing rod. If its open loop response is below 60 kHz, I failed to do the job. If it NEEDS more than 30 dB of global NFB, I botched it.

On the other hand, we do live in the digital era, and it is possible, even if improbable, that some ultrasonic spurious signals could just get into the power amp, so an input filter placed at 300...400 kHz is well advised. After all, once you open the window wide, you open it both to the sunshine and to the dust and airborne dirt.
 
Last edited:
Hi,

IYO what was the best era for Harmon products .....?

The original Citation Tube based range. It was downhill from there, ever accelerating like a vertical drop rollercoaster.

Ciao T

PS, I had a look at the HK680, Dejan holds in such great esteem, it's not a bad design, but I take the Tube HK Citation I/II any day.
 
Last edited:
diyAudio Member RIP
Joined 2005
Sidney used to say he'd only worked for two people in his life: The guy at Bogen, where he decided that his stuff always blew up, and Jimmy Carter.

Kardon was a famous radio guy of course, son of Peter Kardon, and he wasn't Sid's partner for very long and was strongly downplayed in Harman literature. I have an antique radio book that belonged to my father that would have driven Sidney crazy, as it barely mentions him :)

I don't know enough about the early Harman equipment to comment on what the best era was, although I'm inclined to concur with Thorsten and believe the Citation tube stuff was excellent. Richie Miller is credited for the later wide-bandwidth high-current solid-state designs, although other people may well have been involved.

The degree in Social Psychology is legitimate in the sense that the issuing institution was accredited. However, Sid wrote an essay, cited long work experience, and sent a check. When a diploma arrived he showed it to his associate and said, according to lore, "Well. I'm surprised I got this, but I'm going to use it." Within a day the name on his door was prefaced with a "Dr." :p

But when, much later, Harman acquired Becker, one of the key people there who afaik lives on decided he wasn't going to suffer being addressed as other than Dr. The PhD he acquired was in Russian Economics. Oddly the document is inaccessible, generally a sign in academia that something is a little funny.
 
Sidney used to say he'd only worked for two people in his life: The guy at Bogen, where he decided that his stuff always blew up, and Jimmy Carter.

Kardon was a famous radio guy of course, son of Peter Kardon, and he wasn't Sid's partner for very long and was strongly downplayed in Harman literature. I have an antique radio book that belonged to my father that would have driven Sidney crazy, as it barely mentions him :)

I don't know enough about the early Harman equipment to comment on what the best era was, although I'm inclined to concur with Thorsten and believe the Citation tube stuff was excellent. Richie Miller is credited for the later wide-bandwidth high-current solid-state designs, although other people may well have been involved.

The degree in Social Psychology is legitimate in the sense that the issuing institution was accredited. However, Sid wrote an essay, cited long work experience, and sent a check. When a diploma arrived he showed it to his associate and said, according to lore, "Well. I'm surprised I got this, but I'm going to use it." Within a day the name on his door was prefaced with a "Dr." :p

But when, much later, Harman acquired Becker, one of the key people there who afaik lives on decided he wasn't going to suffer being addressed as other than Dr. The PhD he acquired was in Russian Economics. Oddly the document is inaccessible, generally a sign in academia that something is a little funny.


Ha... same as another (In)famous person ...:) ................ :eek::wave2s:
 
Hi,



The original Citation Tube based range. It was downhill from there, ever accelerating like a vertical drop rollercoaster.

Ciao T

PS, I had a look at the HK680, Dejan holds in such great esteem, it's not a bad design, but I take the Tube HK Citation I/II any day.

Of course you will, Thorsten, you are a tube man, and that's OK.

As for HK 680, yes, I do respect it, but sonically it has its share of faults. I mean, while very good in its class, it's hardly the best I've ever come across. Let's just say I think it's better than most, but not as good as some.
 
I'm surprised that a Revox puts out subsonics. Could it be long distance multipath? Aircraft reflections?

Those tones are most likely low frequency CTCSS control tones, or something similar. They are/were used by some FM repeaters to ensure no one else can tune in to it's receive frequency and transmit on it. Also used to suppress squelch in private transmission systems, sometimes perhaps used between radio transmission facility and the station control booth.

Continuous Tone-Coded Squelch System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
less than half, more like 1/4 - look up critical band/bark scale

roughly we lump everything in 100 Hz wide bands together below 500 Hz, and ~ 20% fracton of the center frequency bandwidths above

with ~24 critical bands only 6 are below 640 Hz

also look at loudness curves - dynamic range is much reduced compared to mid frequency as well

which given the lumpy frequency response from modal behavior of small rooms its probably just as well we don't resolve that well at low bass

Those are good points, I see the Bark Scale has also been updated by later research i.e. ERB or Equivalent Rectangular Bandwidth scale.

Yes, the equal loudness curves I've seen before, between 70-90dB the audibility of lower tones is not nearly as diminished as at low levels. At 100Hz, the difference from 1kHz is only 3-5 dB at 90-70dB, and 9-12dB at 60Hz for the same levels.
 
diyAudio Member RIP
Joined 2005
SID Distortion

Courtesy of the Dept. of Redundancy Department, and something that happened at Harman a lot. ;)
 

Attachments

  • SID Distortion.jpg
    SID Distortion.jpg
    931.1 KB · Views: 133
What puzzles me is who might be left in the vast Harman empire who knows how to design non-switching amps. The company has been IMO on a downward spiral of truly ghastly proportions,

A few Crown Presidents ago they did a dog and pony show in Chicago. I went and got to meet the then chief engineer, the new Pres and a bunch of older Crown friends.

Since I come from a smaller company the newbies shook hands and went off elsewhere. At a lunch that day I sat at their table and pulled out one of their new brochures showing the Stadiums and Arenas around the world that used Crown amplifiers. I mentioned that all of the ones in the US were mine. The Pres quickly moved away from the table and cornered one of my friends who told him it was true. He was a bit nicer after that.

Well virtually all of those guys are gone.

Back at last years NY AES Harman was there, after a several year lapse, with a few toys. I said my howdies and mentioned to them that I would be buying loudspeakers from them for this year's project, but would not be buying Crown amplifiers. They accepted the news with the comment they were aware of the problems.

Now sitting next to my desk is an amplifier brought in by a local venue. Last week they brought in their 18" woofer from a drum monitor. The owner was concerned that his house soundman blew it up. Using my pocket diagnostic tool I removed the what appeared to be a perfect cone. It was except the voice coil had burned cleanly off the form. Now that means that the speaker was not played too loud! It means the amplifier out DC into the voice coil. Now it has been at least 20 years since I have seen that kind of failure.

Now for my current project we are mounting the weather sealed loudspeakers to steel frames. Some frames have as many as 9 loudspeakers. Each weighs 200 pounds or so and comes shipped to us on it's own pallet.

The frames when finished weigh a few tons. These are placed on flat bed trucks and shipped to the site. A crane then picks the frame up and ironworkers bolt it in place about 180 feet above the ground. To save money there is no catwalk or other access to the loudspeakers.

The only access to the speakers is to send a climber up on ropes as cranes will not be allowed in once the field is finished. So what do you think it will cost to replace a blown woofer in the field?
 
Well I have never taken Crown's DC moniker lightly, why should anyone else... :)


Personally i have never seen the attraction and have seen them do just what you have described over the decades. I used Mac over them in the 70's ,Bryston, SAE and Hill in the 80's, Crest and QSC in the 80/90's ...

Granted no Stadiums , but never , never , ever fancied the sound or reliability of their amplifiers ...


.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.