|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| The Lounge A place to talk about almost anything but politics and religion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#3371 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
|
Quote:
How one declares it though can vary vastly. One may say: I'll declare my THD into 4 Ohm loads, and since it's low even so, I won't bother with 8 Ohms specs. Or one may provide specs for both load impedances separately. A matter of personal choice and marketing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3372 |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth where censorship of Ideas is frowned upon
|
Hi,
Looks very much latter day HK. There are many places where dropping in a Fet can cut out a lot of circuitry and/or dramatically improve inherent linearity/bandwidth. Ciao T Last edited by ThorstenL; 13th March 2012 at 07:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3373 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3374 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
|
I have very few FETs available to me. Thus, any suggestions, accompanied with possible sources in Germany, would be most productive.
|
|
|
|
|
#3375 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
I hope that you are correct, T. I got the schematic from somewhere, but I don't know where I might have saved it. I would feel happier IF Matti did not take my topology without acknowledgment, because he once took me to task for inadvertently leaving out his Finnish lab from one of my papers, even though I acknowledged him in the paper. (I had included 1 graph that I made there.)
|
|
|
|
|
#3376 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
Looks like 'Super Ampzilla' to me, or the way the Ampzilla should have been made.
|
|
|
|
|
#3377 | |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth where censorship of Ideas is frowned upon
|
Dejan,
Quote:
I would suggest 2SK214/2SJ77 or similar as drivers instead of tripple darlington. 2SK370/2SJ108 (or 2SK170/2SJ74) as followers buffering the VAS. You could more of the J-Fets in the input stage, with a common tail (JC Style) or you could go really RAD with any number of J-Fet buffer schemes, I'd be tempted to look for self-biasing j-Fet/BJT Rush cascodes... Ciao T |
|
|
|
|
|
#3378 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
![]() Long time ago I tried symmetrical complementary topologies with multiple complementary output emitter followers, enormous power supply made from 2KV variac toroid, but they did not want to sound better than Tesla Mono-130 tube amp we had in laboratory, it was PITA!
__________________
If I disappear suddenly, that means I finally created a time machine and pushed wrong button that brought me to Stalin's Russia. In any experiment any result is the result. Even if it is negative. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3379 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Front Row Center
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by a.wayne; 13th March 2012 at 08:15 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#3380 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sound Card for Measurements | Marik | Solid State | 2 | 2nd January 2012 08:59 PM |
| Sound Card Recommendations (For Audio Measurements) | dchisholm | Equipment & Tools | 5 | 16th July 2011 09:40 AM |
| How to protect sound card during amp measurements? | okapi | Everything Else | 13 | 2nd September 2008 03:06 PM |
| Quality Control differences = variations in sound quality? | KT | Class D | 0 | 14th November 2004 06:51 AM |
| Sound cards - test and measurements | jackinnj | Everything Else | 2 | 5th July 2003 03:02 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |