The speed of light is NOT constant - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Member Areas > The Lounge
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Lounge A place to talk about almost anything but politics and religion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st August 2011, 02:27 PM   #1
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: VA
Default The speed of light is NOT constant

The speed of light is NOT constant.

I will now prove this using logical and anthropic scientific methods.

Since it is impossible to get absolutely accurate measurements of anything, ie. there will always be errors when using real world instruments, the speed of light cannot be proven to be constant. Since the speed of light can't be proven to be constant, using anthropic principles, the lack of observable constancy of the speed of light means it does not exist. Therefore the speed of light is not constant.

For more information see Kant, Immanuel: Metaphysics[Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
Old 31st August 2011, 02:35 PM   #2
jlsem is offline jlsem  United States
diyAudio Member
jlsem's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dallas,TX
It seems constant to me.

Old 31st August 2011, 02:57 PM   #3
expert in tautology
diyAudio Member
bear's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York State USA
You do not have a proof - you merely have a hypothesis, one that is based on a type of logic that is more or less chasing its tail.

I am saying nothing about light, which may or may not be constant. Imo, light is illogical and shows us something about where we are and the space around us, but this something is beyond our ability to directly fathom or observe.

We are about as baffled as a dog trying to understand a stereo system... maybe more so.

_-_-bear -- Btw, I don't actually know anything, FYI -- every once in a while I say something that makes sense... ]
Old 31st August 2011, 03:06 PM   #4
bbggg is offline bbggg  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
Originally Posted by 7n7is View Post
The speed of light is NOT constant
Well, it's not, and all it takes to show this is some glass. Glass actually slows light down. That's how lenses work. Metals slow it down considerably, you will be surprised at how slowly an electromagnetic field may propagate in a metal. Now don't let any of this put you off, although it may be a good idea to move to West Virginia while waiting for that phone call from Stockholm.
Old 31st August 2011, 03:53 PM   #5
Nis is offline Nis  Denmark
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Old 31st August 2011, 04:29 PM   #6
bbggg is offline bbggg  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
Actually Kant did walk through all seven bridges of Koenigsberg, but two were bombed in WWII and all proof is now lost forever.
Old 31st August 2011, 04:39 PM   #7
norture is offline norture  Indonesia
diyAudio Member
norture's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Palembang, Indonesia
CMIIW, but the measured speed of light as it is currently known is constant only in vacuum.
Old 31st August 2011, 05:09 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Originally Posted by Nis View Post
Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
That's exactly the point!
Perhaps one can say "It has not been proven to be constant" rather than "It IS not constant".
Old 31st August 2011, 05:56 PM   #9
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: VA
Note that I used to same reasoning as those who argue that there is no aether or transmitting medium of light. They assume its completely undetectable and claim it doesn't exist, in spite of the results of Dayton C. Miller and also the results of stellar aberration experiments with binary stars.
Old 31st August 2011, 05:57 PM   #10
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
I'm not sure what you are claiming. Speed of light not constant in what sense? Are you saying it varies with time, or with the speed of the light emitter? There is some possible weak evidence for the former, and clear experimental evidence against the latter. It is the latter which would disagree with modern relativistic physics, so I assume it is the latter which you are claiming.

Special relativity underlies GPS, the relationship between electricity and magnetism, and the whole of nuclear and particle physics. You really can't just say that this is all wrong, and offer only woffle as evidence.

Closed Thread

Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cosmological constant.... mikeks The Lounge 402 21st February 2005 03:27 PM
Constant current PRBS Pass Labs 6 24th March 2002 12:49 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:31 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2