John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II - Page 4054 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Member Areas > The Lounge

The Lounge A place to talk about almost anything but politics and religion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st June 2013, 07:31 PM   #40531
jcx is offline jcx  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by john curl View Post
Well guys, I have been complaining about excessive distortion in hi K ceramic caps for the last 39 years. Showed measurement in print in 1978. It is a wonderful thing the EDN 'exposes' this problem to today's engineering audience.
Of course, NPO is better, and even very linear, but how about DA? No thanks, I will stick to polystyrene when I can.
must have been falling on deaf ears among those incredibly stupid "audio designers" you keep complaining about here John – probably the “design by ear” crowd

after all any "meter reader" would have caught out hi-K ceramic distortion trivially during measurement - if they hadn't actually read the datasheets, seen the Vcoeff to start, restricted use to non-signal path


Pease graphed NP0 DA - as you well know - it ranks better than Mica, competitive with some film types, with manufacturer being a larger variable

Last edited by jcx; 21st June 2013 at 07:51 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2013, 08:08 PM   #40532
diyAudio Member
 
Steve Eddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by SY View Post
He's also committed to one tonearm. Fashion audio customers hate not being able to mix and match and swap frequently.
Not to mention accessorize.

se
__________________
The Audio Guild
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2013, 10:04 PM   #40533
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
SY
A Burning amp attendee from Monterey told me he had many of the ADI Updates and would try to scan and email them but I lost track of him, maybe he will be there this year. Never saw the ones you mentioned and would like to.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2013, 10:10 PM   #40534
Account disabled at member's request
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Default CE marking

Quote:
Originally Posted by DF96 View Post
As I understand it, you need CE (and lead-free?) to place something on the market in Europe. Personal imports would bypass this system, but in the event of a fire your insurance company might ask some questions.

In the UK CE marking is not seriously enforced so all sorts of (mainly Chinese) junk comes in, with or without CE stickers
Remember that the Chinese are copying everything.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CE Mark.jpg (145.2 KB, 224 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2013, 11:14 PM   #40535
bcarso is offline bcarso  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canoga Park, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by stinius View Post
Remember that the Chinese are copying everything.
Yes, I remember how cheerfully some people said they could make a label that said CE, if that was what the product needed!

But everybody is getting more attentive, I think, these days.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2013, 11:48 PM   #40536
fas42 is online now fas42  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
fas42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NSW, Australia
Blog Entries: 11
China Export ...

Copying Everything ...

Can't Envisage what comes next ...
__________________
Frank the truth is, I just like a bit of ASMR ...
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2013, 01:53 AM   #40537
RNMarsh is offline RNMarsh  United States
diyAudio Member
 
RNMarsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 2457 Cascade Trail; Cool, CA. 95614
I wouldnt put the preamp in a head-shell far from the pivot unless i needed to add weight to the headshell for some strange reason. But in the platter/TT base is fine.

-Thx RNMarsh
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2013, 10:04 AM   #40538
marce is offline marce  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
Out of curiosity RNMarsh, why?
Though my initial thought was not putting the whole pre-amp, though with todays smallish op-amp and fet packaging that would be possible, but just an intermediate signal conditioning (line driver) to boost the signal from the minute voltage put out by the cartridge, so a stronger signal is transmitted to the pre-amp.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2013, 10:34 AM   #40539
qusp is offline qusp  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
qusp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
could you use some sort of mems accelerometer to produce feedback for compensating mechanical error?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2013, 12:57 PM   #40540
diyAudio Member
 
scott wurcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: cambridge ma
Quote:
Originally Posted by qusp View Post
could you use some sort of mems accelerometer to produce feedback for compensating mechanical error?
How would you corellate the motion to signal error? We have a 3 axis one that runs on 1uA. It's for pacemakers and I joke that it's a "I fell down and can't get up" signal.
__________________
"This logos holds always but humans always prove unable to understand it, both before hearing it and when they have first heard it."
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:13 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2