John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II - Page 3864 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Member Areas > The Lounge

The Lounge A place to talk about almost anything but politics and religion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th April 2013, 09:56 AM   #38631
diyAudio Member
 
jacco vermeulen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: At the sea front, Rotterdam or Curaçao
Send a message via Yahoo to jacco vermeulen
Quote:
Originally Posted by iaxxaxxai View Post
Forget about it
If you and a million others were willing to pay $25 for a JFET pair every time, it wouldn't be an issue.
You skipped the most vital criterium, the fact that vacuum valves still is a multi billion dollar business.

(two decades ago, the situation was reversed : folks got out of tube amps and into SS, as it became harder to find valves and/or decent OPT's)
__________________
The buck stops Here
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2013, 10:09 AM   #38632
EUVL is offline EUVL  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
You can still use BF862, 2SK3557, 2SK209, 2SK2145, ......

I do not see any problems.
You just need to start building circlotrons, or Linsley-Hood-type quasi-push-pull's.


Patrick
__________________
xen-audio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2013, 10:12 AM   #38633
EUVL is offline EUVL  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
And progress is iphone, 256GB USB sticks the size of a finger nail, ..... not analog electronics.
Why? Analog does not sell in 3-digit millions a quarter at 3-digit USDs.

Sad, but true.


Patrick
__________________
xen-audio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2013, 10:32 AM   #38634
godfrey is offline godfrey  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cape Town
And yet 741 opamps and 2N3055s just won't go away. I guess they're good for industrial stuff.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2013, 10:36 AM   #38635
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacco vermeulen View Post
If you and a million others were willing to pay $25 for a JFET pair every time, it wouldn't be an issue.
I would IF they were as close to nominal spec as a pair of tubes are. The problem is the three or four to one spread in gm and idss, meaning that I have to buy twenty FETs to get two I can use optimally (if I'm lucky and they're not all clustered over to the wrong side of the spec limits). In many circuits, you can design around this, but not in all- and unfortunately, not in the circuits where I like to use FETs.
__________________
You might be screaming "No, no, no" and all they hear is "Who wants cake?" Let me tell you something: They all do. They all want cake.- Wilford Brimley
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2013, 11:27 AM   #38636
diyAudio Member
 
jacco vermeulen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: At the sea front, Rotterdam or Curaçao
Send a message via Yahoo to jacco vermeulen
Likely the reason I run a semi museum.

(afaih, there are still folks ready & willing to pay dearly for mil-spec matched 6SN7 pairs)
__________________
The buck stops Here
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2013, 11:29 AM   #38637
dadod is offline dadod  Croatia
diyAudio Member
 
dadod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Zagreb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Eddy View Post
Funny isn't it how tube circuits can sound absolutely fantastic, yet there are no complimentary devices in the tube world.

se
Sorry, but as not native Englesh speaker I would like to know if "complimentary" has same meaning as complemetary in American English?
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2013, 11:35 AM   #38638
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 1
No, it's a common writing error. "Complementary" is the right word unless the devices are telling you that you're a handsome and intelligent fellow.
__________________
You might be screaming "No, no, no" and all they hear is "Who wants cake?" Let me tell you something: They all do. They all want cake.- Wilford Brimley
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2013, 11:49 AM   #38639
diyAudio Member
 
jacco vermeulen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: At the sea front, Rotterdam or Curaçao
Send a message via Yahoo to jacco vermeulen
Buy a valve, get a transistor for free. (complimentary towel of the tube hospitality world)

Speaking of semi's and tubes : hybrid folded cascode (bad boy JC Morrison)
__________________
The buck stops Here

Last edited by jacco vermeulen; 27th April 2013 at 11:52 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2013, 12:28 PM   #38640
EUVL is offline EUVL  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
> The problem is the three or four to one spread in gm and idss, meaning that I have to buy twenty FETs to get two I can use optimally

I am sure Jacco can help you out.

But serious, you can still get matched pairs with specific Idss at reasonable price (less than tubes).
And tubes also need matching, not true ?


Patrick
__________________
xen-audio.com
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:47 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2