John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II - Page 1854 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Member Areas > The Lounge

The Lounge A place to talk about almost anything but politics and religion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th November 2011, 06:59 AM   #18531
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
John,

Quote:
Originally Posted by john curl View Post
Thorsten, could you put up the schematic for the TAA761? I am having trouble finding it. I suspect that Studer used something like this with an output stage in 1973, for there A80 MK 1 master recorder.
Others beat me to posting the Info, as you can see, in some ways a quite interesting IC concept for an Audio Grade Op-Amp (compared to example to NE5534).

I personally would have liked a bit of emitter degeneration or even FET Inputs.

But as it stands these where not bad. Still, I designed a whole new channel Cassette replacing discrete circuits with these and it sounded bad...

When we mixed the old discrete Mike Pre's and such with tunable gyrators using these Op-Amp as semi-parametric tone control and used these OPA's as buffers for non-critical buses (FX, Monitor etc.) we got a good compromise between functionality required and sound quality though.

Ciao T
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2011, 07:08 AM   #18532
diyAudio Member
 
john curl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
The schematic looks pretty marginal without an output stage added. Too little current available.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2011, 08:48 AM   #18533
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsula View Post
That works best for me too.

Unfortunately, for development purposes, this is not an efficient way to evaluate designs and components, I'd need years with my limited spare time..
Zinsula

thanks for the reply. We live in the same country so what about to get in touch, if you like we can have a phone call or meet us?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2011, 09:34 AM   #18534
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
John,

Quote:
Originally Posted by john curl View Post
The schematic looks pretty marginal without an output stage added. Too little current available.
To add an external output, I used to add diodes and a little extra resistor in series with the main load resistor (2k) and then BD139/BD140 complementary pair on heatsinks, you can run quite a bit of current that way.

But for many applications the 6mA or so peak output current where more than enough...

Ciao T
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2011, 09:49 AM   #18535
PMA is offline PMA  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
PMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague
Nostalgia for "Ossie" times?

I strongly hope not.
__________________
Pavel Macura
http://web.telecom.cz/macura/audiopage.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2011, 10:27 AM   #18536
diyAudio Member
 
scott wurcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: cambridge ma
Quote:
Originally Posted by john curl View Post
The schematic looks pretty marginal without an output stage added. Too little current available.
The PNP in those days was BAD, thus the use of only one. If that's a lateral pnp there is a parasitic collector not shown and the ft would only be a couple of MHz.
__________________
Silence is so accurate.

Last edited by scott wurcer; 30th November 2011 at 10:31 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2011, 11:59 AM   #18537
diyAudio Member
 
Joachim Gerhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Siemens clones ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2011, 01:02 PM   #18538
PMA is offline PMA  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
PMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague
Quote:
Originally Posted by scott wurcer View Post
The PNP in those days was BAD,
Definitely, in the monolithic ICs technology.
__________________
Pavel Macura
http://web.telecom.cz/macura/audiopage.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2011, 01:51 PM   #18539
diyAudio Member
 
scott wurcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: cambridge ma
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMA View Post
Definitely, in the monolithic ICs technology.
I was assuming these were early IC's. The AD744 allows an external pnp to be directly paralleled. I forgot about the decompensation feature (an extension of OLBW). John only complains about the noise of early bi-FETs, but not all circuits are preamps. There were not many IC's that could do 225kHz at G = 1000.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg aaaaaaabbbb.JPG (30.2 KB, 165 views)
__________________
Silence is so accurate.

Last edited by scott wurcer; 30th November 2011 at 01:54 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2011, 02:27 PM   #18540
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by PMA View Post
Nostalgia for "Ossie" times?
No Ostalgia.

The original Chip was a Thompson Semi Part anyway, not East German.

Ciao T
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2