Vanishing Bee Catastrophe

[dave_gerecke]

I think Higg hid his boson with Blackbeards gold!

[7n7is]

Originally posted by SY
I did.

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/lo...312.pdf?temp=x shows the predictions from relativity (nonetheric) to be better than 10ppb.

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/lo...812.pdf?temp=x shows corrections to be better than 1 part in 10e17.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997PhRvA..56.4405W shows similar extraordinary accuracy of nonetheric correction.

How many more cites do you need before you get the idea that this stuff you're citing is sheer crank?

You just don't understand it, Sy. Everything that supports Einstein's relativity theories (SR and GR) is fake or was written by someone who doesn't understand physics. So called relativistic transformations, ie. time dilation, length contraction and increase in mass with velocity is from the Larmor-Lorentz theory. You can see from this
http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/16133.htm
that you can't trust pro-Einstein people. The Einstein followers belong to a pseudoscientific mafia. They are actually some of the stupidest scientists in the world and claim to be among the smartest as part of their scam to cheat the tax payers out of billions of dollars. They use smoke and mirrors and irrational logic to defend their criminal enterprise.

See these links on see why SR is impossible.

http://ephysics.fileave.com/physics/...Oct-p44-45.pdf

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/Essen-L.htm

http://ephysics.fileave.com/physics/...ord5-Essen.pdf

more here: http://www.geocities.com/sciliteratu...ityDebates.htm

[7n7is]

You also need to know that the journals that are considered to be the most prestigious are forced to remain silent about the Einstein scam. They always reject papers that criticize Einstein. There's been plenty of critics.

Here's a good way to put it.


Dr. George J. Marklin
Articles on Relativity and the Ether
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/mluttgens/marklin1.htm

INTRODUCTION

The equations of the theory of relativity have been verified by
experiment, and are therefore valid beyond question. But this
does not prove that the theory is true. Agreement with experiment
is only a necessary condition, not a sufficient one. Just what is
required to obtain sufficiency is a very complex philosophical
issue known as the problem of induction. Even Ayn Rand did not
have a complete answer, but I believe she identified the essential
requirement: integration.


http://pagesperso-orange.fr/mluttgens/marklin2.htm

[SY]

Having been a referee and on the editorial board of some of those journals, I can assure you that your assertion is absolute nonsense. Einstein's work, like that of any scientist, is certainly open to criticism and revision (a good example being numerous papers on quantum phenomena that he could never accept). It's just that, like anything else in science, you have to have, you know, actual evidence to be taken seriously and get stuff published.

[scott wurcer]

Originally posted by 7n7is


Even Ayn Rand did not have a complete answer.

http://pagesperso-orange.fr/mluttgens/marklin2.htm

Now there's an understatement as Alan Greenspan should well know.

Where does this stuff come from?

EDIT - I see, The Texas Objectivist Society

[scott wurcer]

BTW 7n7 before you go too far, Objectivist means objectivist, with a passion. Most of the stuff posted here would not go over with that crowd. You know, if you can't measure it it does not exist, etc.

[Gyuri]

I sent the undermentioned letter today:
I do not know it, responds to it since many madmen harass poor Stephen apparently. ( Not only I. )
His opinion would be authentic whatever for me.
And enough would be so much possibly, that yes or not.

To Stephen William Hawking

He has truth Einstein?

Kind professor my lord!

Let me allow to express my good wish first, that God or whatever preserves you, and your intellectual reasoning power for the mankind, as long as possible.

His member I am the diyaudio for an Internet community a time of his.

I recognized many reasonable men here. Sometimes not too the audio topics I consider it the most interesting one. Rather the topics with a human concern. or for example this:

diyAudio Forums - Vanishing Bee Catastrophe - Page 1

If his time and his strength allow it professor my lord, I ask it reveals his opinion valued highly to us in the case!

Let you be for a long time with us here on the Earth in a body and in a soul.

With many thanks and best wishes:

Timár György

George Tanner in English

On the forum: ( And his friends. )

Gyuri


I apologise for my foolish English.

[theAnonymous1]

Say goodbye to another creature with a direct impact on our lives.....

http://www.fws.gov/midwest/Endangere...atailment.html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...BgVYwD964EOUO0
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/200...illing_di.html