Go Back   Home > Forums > Member Areas > The Lounge
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Lounge A place to talk about almost anything but politics and religion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st November 2007, 02:23 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
7n7is's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: VA
Default patented perpertual motion machines

Its sometimes claimed that the US Patent and Trademark Office doesn't patent perpertual motion machines, but if you go here
http://www.uspto.gov/go/classificati...4/sched074.htm
scoll down and look at DIG9 PERPETUAL MOTION GIMMICKS
and then look at some of the patents in this subclass, it appears that many of them look like perpertual motion machines.

Here's the list at the USPTO
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...D1=ORCL&d=pall

You need a browser plug-in to view the TIFF images like the one at http://www.alternatiff.com
or you can use http://www.pat2pdf.org or http://ep.espacenet.com/ to get patents in pdf format.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2007, 01:37 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
scott wurcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: cambridge ma
Some of these folks use the clever mis-direction and carefully don't claim the actual perpetual motion. Claim 50 Watts in and 100 Watts out but specifically not claim "connect the input to the output".
__________________
2012, our time is running out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2007, 08:46 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
7n7is's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: VA
Apparently, if they don't use the term "perpetual motion machine" or make it look too suspicious, they can get their patent. Class 74 is on machine elements and mechanisms. As long as the inventor and attorney can convince the examiner that the contraption has some use, it can be patented. Having a patent doesn't prove something works. It just gives someone the right to exclude others from making and using the invention. The examiner can give a 101 rejection (35 USC 101) if he believes it doesn't work (lacks utility based on 35 USC 101). Also, you don't have to explain exactly how something works to get a patent, ie. if it can be demonstrated to work or do something useful, you can get a patent.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2007, 05:07 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
jacquesl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lego Land
Quote:
Originally posted by scott wurcer
Some of these folks use the clever mis-direction and carefully don't claim the actual perpetual motion. Claim 50 Watts in and 100 Watts out but specifically not claim "connect the input to the output".

Its more like 50W In and 30W Out in actual life
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Cardas Patented Binding Posts CPBP-CRS Monkey King Swap Meet 7 26th February 2009 03:45 AM
FREE (almost) DN-970FA CD Cart Machines imix500 Swap Meet 4 10th February 2009 10:41 AM
LPKF Routing Machines wrenchone Everything Else 0 23rd May 2007 08:26 PM
US Voting Machines fmak The Lounge 68 11th November 2004 02:18 AM
Cardas patented binding post Duck-Twacy Multi-Way 24 12th August 2003 05:19 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:15 AM.

Page generated in 0.07622 seconds (76.16% PHP - 23.84% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio