|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Links | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Lighting and OHP any lighting ideas and ohp info |
|
We're saving for a new server - help us to serve you by Donating Today and become a friend with benefits!
Ads on/off / Custom Title / 2009 Tshirt / More PMs / Bigger Images / Advanced printing |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brazil
|
I am building a 7 inch lcd projector. At the moment i 'm planning on using the following gear.
220mm first fresnel 320mm top fresnel 320mm objective What if I had the following equipment? 200mm first fresnel 200mm top fresnel 230mm objective The projection lens will sit 90mm closer to the top fresnel which should give me almost double the light acording to the inverse square law of light. Am I right or wrong?
__________________
1900x1200 All the way baby!!! |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
|
The top fresnel simply directs all of the light into your objective/projection lens.
The only effect of changing the top fresnel and the objective lens to a shorter focal length will be to make your enclosure shorter and the image bigger at the same throw distance. Tgreenwood |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brazil
|
Ok lets say that you place the triplet at 50 feet and there is a fresnel set to direct all the light from the lamp into the triplet still.
So at 50 feet the back of the triplet should receive the same amount of light as at 20 inches away? That would be true if there didn't exist something called the inverse square law of light. Every 25% increase in distance deminishes light intensity by half.
__________________
1900x1200 All the way baby!!! |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: las Vegas
|
on paper 100% yes. In the real world, it will look a whole ****load brighter, but I doubt you will truly get double the intensity. If it were me I would go ahead and do it, the only difference is going to be your image size. With the shortal focal length of the objective your image will be much larger at the same throw.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Inverse Square law only works for direct radiation, if you modify the light with lenses or reflectors it's no longer valid.
__________________
Al The miracle is not to fly in the air, or to walk on the water; but to walk on the earth. Chinese Proverb |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: london
|
NEED RESULTS. NEED FRESNEL. NEED DECISION. EXECUTIVE DECISION
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
|
Inverse square law
Check out the link above. Especially the part that says "The energy twice as far from the source is spread over four times the area, hence one-fourth the intensity." |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
The distance they are refering to here is from your lens to the surface you are projecting onto.
The actual movement of the light through air does not decrease its brightness a noticeable amount. Think of a laser, it is just as bright no matter how far you shine it. |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brazil
|
Quote:
__________________
1900x1200 All the way baby!!! |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Yes it is air and that why this distance doesn't matter. As long as you manage to focus your rays of light from bulb into the objective it doesn't matter how far away it is.
The Inverse square law really just says that if the objective lens is farther from the surface being projected onto it will be less bright. This is because the image will be larger. Not because it is travelling through more air. I hope this helps |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.18488503 seconds (86.61% PHP - 13.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |