Go Back   Home > Forums > Member Areas > Introductions
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Introductions Welcome to the DIYaudio Community. Introduce yourself here so we can get to know you better!

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th May 2007, 09:30 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Default Greetings and measurements from Maastricht

Please allow me to introduce myself....

My name is Gerrit Boers. I'm a 46 year old pharmacist/IT architect. Music and audio have been a long time hobby of mine. I do this for fun and learning, but I repeat myself.
To get a better understanding of the subject at hand I perform a lot of measurements with my Clio system, here are some examples:

Mains and rectifier noise
AC supply noise
Capacitor comparison

Just recently I finished my first single ended amp:

SiTuIT

The amp itself is very simple, but the power supply is a 'tour de force'.


I joined this forum in the hope of getting some inspiration for further travels in the land of music and audio.

Regards,

Gerrit
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2007, 11:25 AM   #2
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Gerrit, welcome to the forums!

I took a quick look at your power supply measurements. Could you say what the measurement parameters were (especially apodization, sample rate, and data length)? The lineshapes and baseline tilt suggest that those settings could be further optimized.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2007, 12:52 PM   #3
Zoran is offline Zoran  Serbia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belgrade
hi,
i just peek at Your SE project...
rely nice example of good topology...
I hope that OT folows the top end requirements of whole design
thanks for the good photos...
__________________
###
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2007, 01:15 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
SY,

After a quick google on apodization (so that's what it's called),

The most important parameters are listed below the graphs:
CHB dBV 48KHz 65536 Rectangular
meaning: measured on channel B (unbalanced) with a sample rate of 48KHz, FFT window size is 64K (65536) and window type is rectangular.

I since realised that a rectangular window is not the best to use if there is a dominant peak in the spectrum. More recent measurements were made using a Hanning window, this seems to be a generally useful type.
I welcome any suggestions you might have on the subject as I have no formal training in this matter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2007, 01:15 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Zoran,

Thanks for the compliment. The idea behind this design is to get a very small footprint, the amp is 12cm wide and 30cm deep. This topology also maximizes the distance between the 'dirty' part of the power supply (at the very bottom) and the amplifier circuit (at the top).
The placement of the components is such that the wire length is minimized.
The output transformer is an amorphous core Lundahl 1623/120mA, the sound is very, very sweet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2007, 02:25 PM   #6
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Try the same measurement with a Blackman-Harris window. You'll get a much better idea of the relative sizes of the peaks. Also, for a measurement of lower frequency stuff, your resolution will be better if you drop the sample rate while making the number of data points as large as you can.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2007, 05:49 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
SY,

Thanks for the advice, I will try this. I think I will put up a page to show the differences between various FFT window types so that other people do not need to repeat my mistakes.

I performed some cumulative spectral decay measurements on amplifiers. As you seem to have a thourough understanding of the subject, could you explain what's going on there?

Cumulative spectral decay
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2007, 10:58 AM   #8
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
The reality is that unless an amp has violent low frequency instability, the time resolution of a CSD is far too coarse to see anything. Think about what the time domain response of a step function is- it drops within a few microseconds to the new value. Even if there's any ringing, the period will be at least a couple of orders of magnitude smaller than the interval between waterfall curves. So all that's left is the artifacts of the measurement, mostly the bandwidth limitations caused by the length of the sample record. That's why you don't see the low frequencies drop. Also, please remember that the popular notion of what a CSD really is is wrong...

If you don't have Joe d'Appolito's book on loudspeaker measurement, I'd certainly recommend it. Very readable chapter on FFT/MLS analysis. And he does a good job of explaining what CSD actually is. My doctoral thesis was on the use of FFT methods in certain acousto-optical measurements, so I'm sensitized to nonsense, and d'Appolito didn't even make me wince one time. It will save you a lot of flailing around and make your measurement capability much, much more powerful.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2007, 02:55 PM   #9
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
 
Cal Weldon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: British Columbia
Welcome to the forums Gerrit.
__________________
Next stop: Margaritaville
Some of Cal's stuff | Cal Weldon Consulting
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2007, 04:06 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Aha,

I
Quote:
The reality is that unless an amp has violent low frequency instability, the time resolution of a CSD is far too coarse to see anything....
It seems I have some reading to do. I will follow up on your recommendation.

For the meantime I have removed the page in question
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
XAB Measurements DarkOne Pass Labs 12 16th April 2006 10:59 PM
New T-Amp measurements Pano Class D 12 14th March 2006 11:32 AM
SW measurements Grandma´s_SUB Everything Else 9 10th January 2005 01:34 PM
anyone have measurements of TB 871? morbo Multi-Way 5 27th November 2004 03:10 AM
Some CCS measurements Jocko Homo Solid State 10 29th May 2002 12:54 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:54 PM.

Page generated in 0.10653 seconds (82.32% PHP - 17.68% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio