Has anyone got experience with using/driving reverb springs units?
I have been experimenting with an accutronics 9eb2c1b model and it is weird. The energy at the input drives the springs so that they physically move and generate resonances all over the place, a few Hz up or down and you can get 10x the output voltage, huge spikes and troughs a few Hz apart. It is much more pronounced at low frequencies (close to 500 Hz and below) and at high input voltages.
A way to avoid this is to lower the driving voltages but then you get almost nothing at the output. Another way I have found is to use a sponge to dumpen the springs and level the output at all frequencies (from 200Hz to 8000 Hz) but I cannot ensure a proper mechanical fit for it to be a proper solution.
This is not related to trying to increase the driving voltages with frequency.
Any comments appreciated.
I have been experimenting with an accutronics 9eb2c1b model and it is weird. The energy at the input drives the springs so that they physically move and generate resonances all over the place, a few Hz up or down and you can get 10x the output voltage, huge spikes and troughs a few Hz apart. It is much more pronounced at low frequencies (close to 500 Hz and below) and at high input voltages.
A way to avoid this is to lower the driving voltages but then you get almost nothing at the output. Another way I have found is to use a sponge to dumpen the springs and level the output at all frequencies (from 200Hz to 8000 Hz) but I cannot ensure a proper mechanical fit for it to be a proper solution.
This is not related to trying to increase the driving voltages with frequency.
Any comments appreciated.
Look at an old Fender schematic for example. They may feed the audio througha 500pf cap to reduce the bottom. Low frequencies turn to mud in a reverb. That is why you see them on guitar amps but not bass amps. SO I don;t doubt you have trouble with lower freqs. Keep them out of it.
How much output are you expecting? If you are expecting line level outputs, you may be overdriving the input to get them. The reverb recovery circuit in guitar amops is a high gain stage.
There should be some application notes on the Accutronics web site, they may be helpful.
They pack a sponge in the works when shipping to prevent them flopping around, but the springs should remain free in the air when in use. Nothing should touch the springs.
How much output are you expecting? If you are expecting line level outputs, you may be overdriving the input to get them. The reverb recovery circuit in guitar amops is a high gain stage.
There should be some application notes on the Accutronics web site, they may be helpful.
They pack a sponge in the works when shipping to prevent them flopping around, but the springs should remain free in the air when in use. Nothing should touch the springs.
I have looked at Fender schematics (I own a Princeton Chorus) and also have written to the new owners of Accutronics, now in Korea.
For low frequency filtering, Fender use a 150 Hz high pass filter, so I am only looking at 200Hz and above.
The manufacturer suggests a driving current of 3.1mA for my model, which is almost absurd, as you can see on the table below I'd need 25V rms at 8KHz. At 200Hz, 330 and 500Hz, I'd need 806 - 1806 mV RMS which would make the whole tank ... shake, and produce all thiose weird resonances.
I have decided to go for a more modest 1mA, which then produces this table:
Now, 8KHz needs 8V rms, which is achievable from a +/- 15V supply and ordinary op-amp (buffered). I will try it today to see what sort of output I get out and what, if any resonances are still present.
For low frequency filtering, Fender use a 150 Hz high pass filter, so I am only looking at 200Hz and above.
The manufacturer suggests a driving current of 3.1mA for my model, which is almost absurd, as you can see on the table below I'd need 25V rms at 8KHz. At 200Hz, 330 and 500Hz, I'd need 806 - 1806 mV RMS which would make the whole tank ... shake, and produce all thiose weird resonances.
Code:
Accutronics reverb tank 9eb2c1b
I(ma) 3.100 max output
F Hz R Ohm V RMS mV V in peak mV
20 70 217 307
100 140 434 614
200 260 806 1,140
330 418 1,296 1,833
500 612 1,897 2,683
1,000 1,220 3,782 5,349
2,000 2,330 7,223 10,215
5,000 5,200 16,120 22,797
8,000 8,300 25,730 36,388
10,000 10,200 31,620 44,717I have decided to go for a more modest 1mA, which then produces this table:
Code:
Accutronics reverb tank 9eb2c1b
I(ma) 1.000 max output
F Hz R Ohm V RMS mV V in peak mV
20 70 70 99
100 140 140 198
200 260 260 368
330 418 418 591
500 612 612 865
1,000 1,220 1,220 1,725
2,000 2,330 2,330 3,295
5,000 5,200 5,200 7,354
8,000 8,300 8,300 11,738
10,000 10,200 10,200 14,425Now, 8KHz needs 8V rms, which is achievable from a +/- 15V supply and ordinary op-amp (buffered). I will try it today to see what sort of output I get out and what, if any resonances are still present.
Last edited:
Not sure what your application will be, but 8kHz just doesn;t matter in a guitar amp. Most guitar speakers are well riolled off by 5k. This is why you don;t see tweeters on guitar amps.
If you already have a Fender amp with reverb, perhaps running test signals through it and monitoring signal levels would be illuminating.
Where did those resistance numbers come from? In the 9 series, an E input is 800 ohms of impedance, 58 ohms DC. I've seen freq response curves for these pans, but I have not seen an impedance curve.
I have to admit I am unsure what the problem is you are encountering with resonances. The whole point of a spring reverb is to generate signal artifacts not present in the original.
If you already have a Fender amp with reverb, perhaps running test signals through it and monitoring signal levels would be illuminating.
Where did those resistance numbers come from? In the 9 series, an E input is 800 ohms of impedance, 58 ohms DC. I've seen freq response curves for these pans, but I have not seen an impedance curve.
I have to admit I am unsure what the problem is you are encountering with resonances. The whole point of a spring reverb is to generate signal artifacts not present in the original.
The Fender circuitry has a high-pass filter at 150Hz and at 220 Hz, and a (variable) low-pass at about 5.5KHz on the recovery stage.
I have measured the impedances again as follows (first time my tone generator's control knob was loose and I was measuring slightly wrong frequencies)
I am still experimenting, I have built a driver and a recovery circuit and am getting good results.
I have measured the impedances again as follows (first time my tone generator's control knob was loose and I was measuring slightly wrong frequencies)
Code:
F Hz R Ohm
20 123
100 152
200 240
330 375
500 554
1,000 1,123
2,000 2,150
5,000 4,710
6,000 5,570
8,000 7,290
10,000 9,130I am still experimenting, I have built a driver and a recovery circuit and am getting good results.
My advice in sum is: don;t over-analyze this. Millions of guitar amps work just fine with no special design circuits. The fact that nominal impedance for one of these is not flat at all, is no surprise. We design amps for speakers labelled as "8 ohms" and we ignore that each speaker has an impedance curve that is all over the map. Yet the amp works just fine.
The sample drive circuit Accutronics publishes is simple and it works. Look for example at the reverb drive circuit in just about any Peavey amplifier. One 4558 or similar dual op amp drives and recovers the reverb.
The sample drive circuit Accutronics publishes is simple and it works. Look for example at the reverb drive circuit in just about any Peavey amplifier. One 4558 or similar dual op amp drives and recovers the reverb.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.