|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Instruments and Amps Everything that makes music, Especially including instrument amps. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Adelaide
|
Hi,
I'm looking at a Fender Super Reverb circa 1970, which has had its original power supply transformer replaced. The replacement transformer, a locally made item, appears to be possibly twenty or more years old - the company that manufactured it is well and truly gone. It has a primary winding rated for 240 VAC and a secondary winding of 175-0-175 VAC @ 145 mA, well below the Fender original 360-0-360 VAC. Could there be any practical reason why this amp might be fitted with this transformer, (apart from the fact that it might have been the only option available at the time). Is it even possible to properly bias the valves under these conditions? Any comments are much appreciated, |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: !
|
The only thing I can think of is if they had the power supply double the voltage it may work okay.
Voltage Multipliers You'd see some capacitors and diodes added. That amp probably sounds pretty bad in it's current state .
Last edited by defec; 4th January 2012 at 07:50 PM. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Adelaide
|
thanks defec, - there's nothing I can see in the way of voltage doubling. The rectifier tube is gone and a bridge rectifier has been added, from there on in it looks fairly original. The amp has been used regularly and 'sounding good' until only recently having developed some problems.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Perhaps a lower HT, like a saggy HT, would introduce power amp distortion earlier?
That's the only thing I can think of, but I'd see if a "correct" transformer can be found: restoring the amp to its original specification seems wiser than running it in a way it wasn't designed for. Chris |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lansing, Michigan
|
Does it make about 240VDC for B+? OR 480?
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Adelaide
|
Chris - I think the 'correct' replacement transformers aren't too hard to come by and it would be good, as you say, to run the amp as was designed. That being said I'm kind of curious to know what the guy was up to who fitted the replacement.
@Enzo to my surprise B+ is 500VDC. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
500VDC with the tubes installed and in play mode? Also sounds like it has a voltage doubler wired in. Does the PT get hot in play mode? (not standby)
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Adelaide
|
Hi jjman, to confirm: 500VDC, tubes installed and in play mode. The PT does not get hot in playmode.
To widen the picture a bit, there is another foreign object in the chassis which I assume is a small transformer/rectifier to supply the bias voltage as it likely this wasn't available from the main power transformer. One side is connected to line voltage at the fuse holder and power switch with the other side being connected to the bias circuit alone. The PT transformer secondary wires, labeled (correctly?) 175 VAC connect directly to the bridge rectifier which connects to the original standby switch and power supply filtering. Well, regardless of the theory behind it, it works. And in the interests of learning stuff about the amp a bit of mystery can be a good thing. Thanks for your ideas, everyone. Anymore thoughts are welcome! |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lansing, Michigan
|
OK, so it is labelled 175v, but you are getting full B+ voltage. SO there is no "problem", this is just a matter of interest. Fair enough.
It has a 240v primary, but is there any chance the mains are actually wired to the primary configured for 120v operation, which would double the secondary voltages when 240v was applied to that? 350-0-350 would net you about 500VDC when rectified and filtered. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Adelaide
|
I can't be sure, but there's every chance that this, or closely related, must be the case and it's as good an explanation as I could ask for.
There must be some adaption of the PS transformer because it doesn't seem necessary to use such a heavy gauge wire, (the orange leads seen in picture), on the secondary for the heater supply. I would expect to see this gauge wire used on the primary side. Last edited by richardpp; 7th January 2012 at 11:36 PM. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using low voltage lamp in power supply | EddieRich | Tubes / Valves | 22 | 21st October 2011 02:01 PM |
| Precision Adjustable Low Voltage DC Power Supply | Stocker | Equipment & Tools | 0 | 19th December 2010 05:44 AM |
| Joule Thief - LED low voltage Power supply - With pictures | vr4 | Everything Else | 7 | 12th February 2009 12:49 PM |
| Low Voltage High Power Supply | thndr | Power Supplies | 4 | 2nd February 2008 12:33 PM |
| Low Voltage (+70V) Power Supply Design | mwl6m | Power Supplies | 43 | 1st August 2007 01:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |