|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Instruments and Amps Everything that makes music, Especially including instrument amps. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Hi All
I am putting together a belt preamp for a new Takamine Triax pickup (LR Baggs M1 essentially) for my acoustic. This pickup has an output of around 100mV maximum and therefore I need a little over 20dB of gain. I also want a volume control and low output impedance. I have put together the circuit below based on a OPA2134 op-amp (a little over kill for this app, but I need the headroom and very low noise) I wondered if you could advise if it would be better to configure the input op-amp as unity gain and use the op-amp after the volume pot to provide all the gain, or as shown, share the gain between both op-amp sections? I am thinking that if the input op-amp had less output, this may lower any pot noise when adjusting the volume? Also do you guys and girls think the component values I have in the feedback loops etc will result in good low noise and good fidelity operation? Any improvement suggestions are very welcome! Cheers Ray |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Derbyshire
|
I would have thought either way would make no difference at all - as would using a single opamp with a 4.7K pot on the output.
__________________
Nigel Goodwin |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Hi Nigel
How are you doing and thanks for your reply! I wanted to put the volume pot in front of the op-amp on the output so that I always have an unaltered high impedance input and low impedance output. With a pot directly across the output, the output impedance will alter depending on the pot setting and generally always be higher than without the pot. If I use the first op-amp as unity gain (so just a buffer), do you see any noise problems, or other, with running the second op-amp at the required 20dB gain? Cheers Ray |
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Derbyshire
|
Quote:
Quote:
I doubt you will be able to hear any difference no matter how you do it, not measure any difference either (including the single opamp version with a 4.7K pot).
__________________
Nigel Goodwin |
||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 24db LR crossover polarity | digits | Multi-Way | 6 | 9th May 2011 12:18 PM |
| LR reverse null axis | gainphile | Multi-Way | 3 | 13th June 2010 12:10 AM |
| LR 4th order vs LR 8th order crossover | redliner | Subwoofers | 1 | 7th January 2009 11:32 PM |
| LR xover question | steverb | Multi-Way | 12 | 20th April 2004 09:12 PM |
| output LR filter | Helix | Solid State | 7 | 8th February 2002 12:08 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09527 seconds (75.49% PHP - 24.51% MySQL) with 10 queries |