|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Headphone Systems Everything to do with Headphones |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
|
Hi,
I'm looking at two different headphone amps to build. One is Erno Borbely's hybrid headphone amp, and the other is Pete Millet's "Starving Student". Both are Class A, SE, and run on the same rail voltage. The former uses 2SK2013 output devices with feedback; the latter uses IRF510 without feedback. - Is there likely to be a audible difference between these two output devices, which appear to be operated as source followers? - Can I use the 2SK2013 in the "Starving Student"? I understand that the threshold voltages for the 2SK1013 (depending on the Vgs classification) is much lower than for the IRF510 - I may want to parallel 2 2SK2013's. Are there any estimates on the variance of Vgs vs. Idss for the 2SK2013? If I wanted to match pairs, I'd like to get a sense of how many devices I need to buy in order to get a reasonably close match, say <5% from the same lot. Thanks and regards, Rob |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North America
|
Why go single-ended and discrete? You end up with more distortion, more cost (this was the main good reason to go SE, when semiconductors cost more), and more work to do.
If you're really intent on using such outdated topologies I'd suggest the starving student. At least it uses feedback. Even on that one the output caps are way too small and I'd be a bit weary of trusting that point to point design -- something rattles around in the wrong way and you can say bye-bye to your best headphones. It looks like they payed no attention to grounding but since they use tubes I guess noise performance is a moot point. Honestly you're better off using a BUF634 and an op amp all with global feedback, or even a plain high-current op amp. At least this will be rather predictable. That starving student design has a THD and frequency response that I'd expect from a cheap MP3 player, and god knows how that other one without any feedback measures. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hybrid tube headphone amp design | ashok | Headphone Systems | 21 | 30th December 2012 05:17 PM |
| Insane Hybrid Headphone Amp (IHHA) | BowtoEd | Solid State | 2 | 28th June 2012 06:19 AM |
| Headphone output for tubelab simple SE amp | 2bz | Tubelab | 5 | 18th January 2011 03:18 AM |
| Portable Tube/Hybrid Headphone Amp | petesjoy | Headphone Systems | 1 | 15th November 2009 12:57 PM |
| New Hybrid Output Stage and booster for SE Amp | smoking-amp | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 20th March 2006 02:24 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |