|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Headphone Systems Everything to do with Headphones |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Somewhere in Quebec
|
hi everyone.
I dont want tube necessarely as my budget might not allow. I use some cheap ath m50 and will eventually get hd-650. I have 200$ for the whole project. which project would fit my needs? Is this fred cmoy jrc4556 ra-1 good enough?
__________________
Actual top 5: 1- Kettel 2- Miles Davis 3- Gil Scott Heron 4- John Coltrane 5- Dinosaur Jr. System: EC designs SD1 SD Player-> Pass B1-> PP 6B4G-> 3 way. |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
NwAvGuy: O2 Details
or just buy it: JDS Labs - Objective2 Headphone Amplifier many more hobby project amps have been presented in the past: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Italy
|
If you go cheap on the casework, you can build most DISCRETE designs, such as Marsh, CK2III, etc.
__________________
"The total harmonic distortion is not a measure of the degree of distastefulness to the listener and it is recommended that its use should be discontinued." D. Masa, 1938 |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Somewhere in Quebec
|
Quote:
what is the cheaper to build, the CK2III or Marsh?
__________________
Actual top 5: 1- Kettel 2- Miles Davis 3- Gil Scott Heron 4- John Coltrane 5- Dinosaur Jr. System: EC designs SD1 SD Player-> Pass B1-> PP 6B4G-> 3 way. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
while "discrete is superior" is an entrenched Audiophile meme - they never placed a "expires by date" on it
O2 is likely indistinguishable in DBT against any other objectively good, flat frequency response, low output Z, low distortion design regardless of technology, within its I,V output capability but similar chip count composite/multiloop amplifiers, using "better" speced op amps released in the past decade or so are really untouchable at line level audio today - if accuracy is any part of your hifi amplifier definition isolated bipolar, SiGe, GHz semi processes, advanced internal circuit designs by big companies competing for modern telcom, imaging market applications have taken a big step forward from the era of 4556, 5534 even $5-10 for op amps shouldn't blow a $200 budget I quite understand as a circuit designer the greater enjoyment I derive from discrete circuit design - I just don't confuse that with being able to reach the performance specs of properly applied best in class modern monolithic op amps anywhere their input noise, output I,V capabilities meet the application's demands Last edited by jcx; 8th January 2013 at 08:05 PM. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Italy
|
The main issue of opamp based headamps is the lack of current, which makes them not very suited for low Z 'phones.
Now, the hd650 is NOT low impedance and the o2 would drive it fine. About how it sounds, I don't really know. I don't have any friend with one to do an AB test. My suggestion to go discrete was dictated by the budget of the OP and by the fact that this is a DIY forum. Btw he can also buy a shiit M-something (forgot the name) for 99$.
__________________
"The total harmonic distortion is not a measure of the degree of distastefulness to the listener and it is recommended that its use should be discontinued." D. Masa, 1938 |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
the O2 choice of 4556 is driven by the +/- 70 mA output spec, and that is doubled by paralleling the 2 op amps in each chip, per channel - so +/- 140 mA peak should be available
M50 38 Ohms absorbs >300 mWrms @ 140 mA peak drive unfortunately their site doesn't qualify their 99 dB sensitivity with the reference level, the old standard of 1 mW or 1 Vrms as is becoming more common 99 dB +25 dB re 1 mW is ridiculous @ 124 dB SPL but even if we go with +17 dB re 1V, for 116 dB SPL clipping level with O2 driving the "low impedance" - thats not so shabby loudness wise either but my default choice of a modern output drive op amp is the TPA6120 (rebadged THS6012 DSL driver chip) 100 MHz CFA op amp with 400 mA output current and ppm distortion, designed to drive DSL transformer's 25 Ohm impedance - and I have paralleled 2 of them... Last edited by jcx; 8th January 2013 at 09:10 PM. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
CMOY not very good, and if the rA-1 is the Grado one its stupidly costly. I've had a dozenish headphone amps and messed about with mods, psus, valves, kits, off the shelf, essentially I've tried most sensible approaches except high voltage tubes, and my conclusion from 14 years of this is: if you have a stepped attenuator and a PSU per channel, any decent solid state amp will sound very good and blow away affordable shop stuff. People that are invested in one design or other will claim superiority or that practical perfection has been reached, they aren't right but aren't that wrong either.
If you want to build a kit look for one that lends itself to seperating the left and right channel power. If you want a ready built amp see if the case can accomodate a stepped attenuator or other fancy volume control, the latest version of the Neco MOSFET has a psu per channel but could do with modding for a stepped attenuator. The Panda kit on ebay is very good with HD600, so should go well with HD650. Best budget for a box for the transformers and one for the amp, will come in at under a bit $200 unless you go for boutique upgrade parts in which case it your own fault. The O2 is highly rated but is smd and if pre-made may be difficult to change to a larger volume control. An alternative would be Low distortion ( 0.0001%!) preamplifier headphone amp ! | eBay Get free sample chips from TI and the thing could easily come in for a $100. |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Italy
|
Quote:
![]() My HP peaks about 440mA
__________________
"The total harmonic distortion is not a measure of the degree of distastefulness to the listener and it is recommended that its use should be discontinued." D. Masa, 1938 |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
The tpa6120 is surface mounted with 20+ legs, there are lots of designs for headphone amps using it here and around the net.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| suggestion for a 15 inch, under 200$ each that is good from 35hz to 300hz | murphythecat8 | Multi-Way | 34 | 24th November 2012 02:50 AM |
| It's my AD815 headamp | Kochkurov Maxim | Chip Amps | 16 | 11th May 2006 11:44 AM |
| another chip headamp | digi01 | Chip Amps | 6 | 23rd June 2004 03:18 AM |
| Difference between Hertz HS-200 and HX-200 | FaZ72 | Multi-Way | 2 | 8th April 2004 01:34 PM |
| Aura Ca-200 / Pa-200 | cdl | Solid State | 8 | 7th October 2003 12:13 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |