|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Headphone Systems Everything to do with Headphones |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
|
Simple design but with good performance
1.4mA through each LTP transistor, 10 mA through the VAS, Output biased at 150mA. Input and feedback has its own little ground island that goes back to star ground, rest of the board has a ground plane with the current sources as well as the supply caps and DC servo connected to this plane, it also acts as a shield. Simulated THD20 with +/- 15VDC supplies : THD20 at 1VRMS into a 32 Ohm load is 0.001169% rising to 0.011811% at 7VRMS THD20 at 1VRMS into a 250 Ohm load is 0.000955% rising to 0.007606% at 7VRMS THD20 at 1VRMS into a 600 Ohm load is 0.000929% rising to 0.007663% at 7VRMS Still need to do a little tweaking and adding a DC servo to the layout. Simple to build with no matching of transistors required and a relatively low component count. Last edited by Neutrality; 13th October 2012 at 01:11 PM. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
|
This is now my third headphone amplifier design.
What I have done with Midgard compared with Thor and Mjølner is a case of simplifying the build, with fewer parts and no matching of parts required. Thor was my first project and it had great performance into 32-600 Ohm loads but the need for matched input JFET's and the multistage topology made it unessecarily expensive and complicated to build. Mjølner was my second project, slightly worse performance than Thor and it was only really good for 150-600 Ohm loads, but I removed a few stages and it was therefore easier to build. However, it still used input JFET's that needed to be matched. Midgard, now this could be the best of the bunch. It does not have the same 100% symmertry as Thor and Mjølner but it is much simpler to build with no matching of parts required. Gone is the JFET's in the input, a few stages have been removed but it retains(improves really) the same performance as Thor into 32-600 Ohm loads. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Nice design and good to see laterals used for something like this.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
|
With a low gain of X2.5 simulation shows it capable to drive up to 5nF loads directly without stability issues. This SHOULD be good enough for majority of cables out there, however, if instabilty shows up there are 3 solutions :
1. Increase the Miller compensation cap. This gives a little higher THD as well as lower slewrate. Slewrate is directly proportional to size of the Miller cap. 2. Increase gain. Many amps do not like it the closer to unity gain they get, increasing gain improves stabilty into capacitive loads. 3. Add a 2uH//2R filter in series with the output signal. This isolates the output from any capacitive loads seen on the other side of the 2uH//2R filter. Personally, adding 2uH//2R at the output is my favourite since it does not affect THD or slewrate. This means you can have a low distortion, high slewing amp and still retain the ability to drive highly capacitive loads. It might not be an issue at all, but until I actually build the amp I won't really know. Last edited by Neutrality; 13th October 2012 at 04:24 PM. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
very cool!
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Italy
|
I was looking forward to this
__________________
"The total harmonic distortion is not a measure of the degree of distastefulness to the listener and it is recommended that its use should be discontinued." D. Masa, 1938 |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Italy
|
Please pm me when the pcb will be available.
__________________
"The total harmonic distortion is not a measure of the degree of distastefulness to the listener and it is recommended that its use should be discontinued." D. Masa, 1938 |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
|
I am sorry to inform you of this, but this project is put on hold for the near future.
I just do not have the time and money to put into as many projects as I would like. Maybe I will go back and look at this project again sometime early next year. ![]() But for now, do not hold your breath waiting for it.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
|
I have resurrected this project but there has been a few changes, changes big enough to warrant a new thread.
Give me a few minutes. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mjølner, another all discrete Lateral FET Headphone Amplifier | Neutrality | Headphone Systems | 13 | 13th October 2012 07:42 PM |
| Complementary JFET-JFET cascode input, BJT VAS-Drivers, Lateral Output | Neutrality | Solid State | 53 | 23rd October 2011 06:53 PM |
| Thermal compensation for BJT drivers with Lateral FET output | Neutrality | Solid State | 5 | 14th October 2011 07:21 PM |
| Advantage of a FET-BJT CCS vs BJT only | Bitrex | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 10th June 2009 03:01 AM |
| Five-BJT low power headphone amp | linuxguru | Headphone Systems | 26 | 20th August 2008 11:26 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |