|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Headphone Systems Everything to do with Headphones |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brno
|
It seems TPA6120A headphone amp is ideally driven by balanced input such as opamp buffered balanced DAC output. How can be then crossfeed used (I mean passive corssfeed between opamp and TPA6120A2)? All crossfeed designs I have seen (such as Meier) are always unbalanced and mixing unbalanced R to L channel with passive filter. Does anybody ever designed balanced crossfeed circuit?
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Notice that the TPA6120a is a current feedback amp which makes it a bit special compared to ordinary voltage feedback. An another thing is the high input bias current of 12 uA. This can create a huge output offset.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me Tube Buffered Gainclone in work |Thread |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brno
|
There will be a opamp "buffer"similar as shown in TPA6120A2 datasheet (with PCM1792 DAC). The corssfeed passive circuit should be in front of this opamp buffer so I think it has no negative impact on TPA6120A2 itself.
What is not clear to me is how to design balanced crossfeed to both R+ / R- rails (and L+ / L-). |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
is choosing a less facetious title...
diyAudio Member
|
one thing is for sure, in order to not ruin CMRR and distortion performance you would have some pretty serious matching of passive components to do for the filter network
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
much balanced interface equipment does diff-to-single ended conversion internally for processing, then back to balanced for output if required
pure balanced path doesn't seem to have any technical justification - just "eye candy", appeals to the most "inconvenient, most expensive implementation must be better" strain of Audiophiledom my view of balanced output DACs is that they are forced by digital noise, substrate coupling to use balanced output to get decent numbers – a problem with MHz clocked 100k+ digital transistors on the same die in fact it is worth being suspicious of balanced outputs – did they provide sufficient RF common mode filtering internally or are they just exporting the clock feedthru, shaped noise to the next piece in the chain? |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Connecticut
|
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| van Waarde with crossfeed? | hummel | Headphone Systems | 0 | 30th June 2011 08:50 PM |
| Crossfeed problem (Jan Meier's design) | noobman92 | Analog Line Level | 3 | 29th November 2010 07:00 PM |
| Crossfeed circuit | tgymartin | Everything Else | 1 | 11th July 2009 06:46 PM |
| Looking for TPA6120A2 | Odysei | Swap Meet | 1 | 2nd June 2007 08:49 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |