|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Headphone Systems Everything to do with Headphones |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I would like to build an headphone amplifier based on the well known opa + buf634 pair configured as seen on the datasheet, but i would also add an input buffer before the pot to have a better impedance interface with various sources.
My questions are: 1) is this correct or i have to add series and/or parallel resistor between the first opamp and the pot and/or between the pot and the second opamp? 2) which is the correct value for the pot? (i have one 20K and one 100K ALPS) Ciao Andrea |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary
|
The basic circuit already has a very high input impedance; you don't need the buffer, unless you need a higher input impedance than the pot value. If you use the 100K pot, that will be the input impedance. You haven't gained anything by adding the buffer with its 100K input impedance.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I am agree with Paul..
You dont need the first opamp. Just you might put a 100K pot and a 100K fixed resistor as input load (to prevent oscillation in case of pot failures) that makes at least 50K input impedance which is enough for a sound system.
__________________
Best regards, Ozgur |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks Dx and paul, but without the input buffer i have a variable input impedance or am i wrong?
Ciao Andrea |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Right,
As I mentioned, you will have AT LEAST 50K input impedance.. Is it a problem for you?
__________________
Best regards, Ozgur |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
For a 100 k pot or lower, the input impedance will vary less than 0.000001 %. Hardly anything to worry about. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Wihout parallel resistor, thats right. But in this case your only input load will be the potentiometer. Thats a risk I guess..
However with parallel resistor to pot, then input impedance will vary between 50K to ~100K ...
__________________
Best regards, Ozgur |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
Why? The pot itself has a fixed resistance between input and ground, and the wiper is connected to a 10 GOhm op amp input, which can be neglected. Hence the very low figure I posted. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
May be there is a misunderstanding.
I meant, Yes youre right, there will be no input impedance swing if you use just a potentiometer on input. However, I adviced a parallel resistor to middle pin of the pot to gnd. So in this case you will have a variable input impedance. But this is a need I think. Because as my experiences, if an opamp works without an input load resistor then it becomes unstable situation. And if your potentiometer fails while running without a parallel resistor then your headamp may oscillate and you may say goodbye forever to your precious headphone..
__________________
Best regards, Ozgur |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
OK, I see. I was commenting on the original schematic.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Buffer headphone amp | percy | Headphone Systems | 39 | 11th November 2010 10:14 AM |
| mos/bjt buffer in class A for headphone amp | sunrise | Headphone Systems | 7 | 20th October 2008 06:34 PM |
| Quasi complementary headphone buffer | ash_dac | Headphone Systems | 0 | 13th August 2006 11:35 AM |
| Eight Part Harmony: The Tao Headphone Buffer | Steve Eddy | Headphone Systems | 4 | 13th November 2003 06:19 PM |
| Buffer/Headphone Amp | Dan Banquer | Headphone Systems | 0 | 29th August 2003 10:14 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |