|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
(I need a functioning table saw) Indications from original aspect 10"coupler with Beta 8CX & 10CX gave impression that 8 and 10K might be ok players with a fair amount of punch. A 10K wiht ~1 cubic foot rear chamber was a bit tight for 10cx and perhaps too much depth and baffle-tilt on the front pipe. 8CX played a bit lower with somewhat less upper bass output than 10 and both had similar (too much) output in what appeared to be coupled-cavity peak region. Beta 8cx & 10cx are tough to pop and qts pretty low. Wonder what might be the best pipe height and width vs Sd when attempting these size couplers?
one builder had about the following size for 10K - flare may have been KenL's "trax 60" ![]() KenL's flare http://hometown.aol.com/klehma/karlson.html |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sizing PP OPT | alexg | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 11th June 2007 08:19 AM |
| How might one design Karlson-type cabinets? | freddi | Multi-Way | 6 | 24th November 2006 01:56 PM |
| Sizing capacitors | preiter | Power Supplies | 5 | 29th May 2006 05:48 AM |
| Sizing a Regulator | cantskienuf | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 17th May 2005 04:55 AM |
| Sizing thermistors | eeka chu | Parts | 7 | 19th December 2004 08:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06707 seconds (70.03% PHP - 29.97% MySQL) with 10 queries |