Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th January 2007, 06:23 PM   #21
knorke is offline knorke  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
knorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eichstetten
Quote:
Originally posted by dfreemansc
Knorke
Yes a gated response would be much better, but when I tried using Speaker Workshop I got totally non-reproducible results - probably GIGO on my part, but I got fed up of it!
I can recommend ARTA for taking measurements.
The demo version is nearly full functional. And 75€
is not to much for the full version. A good and reliable
measurement setup will help you to get the most out of your speakers...
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2007, 09:19 PM   #22
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Midlands, England
Thanks - I'll check it out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2007, 08:17 PM   #23
Svein_B is offline Svein_B  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
I have been inspired by this tread to try the ARTA speaker measurement software. I already had some Panasonic electret capsules purchased in the hope of being able to make a simple measurement system. I am very impressed by this software and what it does!

I have two pairs of FE126E. One pair has been treated with a little to much coating resulting in some loss of "sting", the other pair is brand new (only a few hours), and only [just] listeneble with my sweetest sounding SE amp.

Below is measurements of an experiment to try to dampen the cone brakup modes on a new driver. I temporarily arranged five 2/3" felt furniture pads arround the outer part of the cone. Not a complete success, but a hint of less sharp resonances - but as always some loss of highs.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fe126e-measured.jpg (53.5 KB, 501 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2007, 09:29 PM   #24
Svein_B is offline Svein_B  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
OPS!
Just realized that the above measurements were done with the wrong microphone - not the Panasonic. That explains some of the peaks, but the differences should be representative.

Here is another measurement with the right mic, on-axis 1m.
This looks almost too good
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fe126e-run2.jpg (44.5 KB, 495 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2007, 08:55 PM   #25
Svein_B is offline Svein_B  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Here is an experiment with a narrow notch-filter to tame the peak just below 7 KHz.

I am not (yet) sure if the filter will improve the sound, but it may seem to move some sharper sounds a bit backwards. I think however that the problem of the 7KHz peak (if it is a problem) depends to a great extent on the listening room and in particular the distance from listener to the speakers.

To illustrate the consistency of different measurements of the 126e, I have assembled all the measurements referred to earlier in this thread stretched to the same scale here: FE-126e Measurements (100KB)
They all show good consistency above 2 KHz.

SveinB.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fe126e-notch-measure.jpg (49.2 KB, 427 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2007, 12:19 PM   #26
holdent is offline holdent  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ontario
Svein_B - Great measurements and comparisons! I've started to do the same but looking at BSCs in a FE126E project. What type of enclosure were you using when you did these measurements?

Also I'm not familiar with ARTA (I use TrueRTA), were these measurements done using white noise or pink noise?

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2007, 06:11 PM   #27
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Acknowledgement are due to Mark M on the crumbs he left that lead to my FE126/127 mod. It would not have been as successful as it is if i wsas not able to stand on his shoulders. I simply took the tools i had available, Mark's comments, and my experience modding drivers & rolled them into something -- if not perfect -- certainly makes an FE126 or FE127 sound WAY better.

Chris & i are just assembling some tools to do both quantitiative & qualitative assessment of a number of mods.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2007, 06:43 PM   #28
Svein_B is offline Svein_B  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Thanks for joining in Dave! I look forward to seeing comparative measurements of your modded drivers. Since there are many testimonials about the sonic results, the measurements may help to understand what makes the difference.

The notch-filter experiment shown above is not something I am sure I will recommend. The very sharp filter requires precise component tuning. 10% tolerances would miss the point.

The felt-pad experiment in post#23 indicate that a mechanical modification may produce a better smoothing of the peaks - when ignoring the large hump around 5K caused by using the wrong microphone.

SveinB
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2007, 02:27 AM   #29
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally posted by Svein_B
the measurements may help to understand what makes the difference.
There are some things a FR will not show (a waterfall might thou) and that is the pushing down of the noise floor (as well as using the FE127e as a guinea pig we are using CSS FR125S. There is 1 mod that makes a dramatic improvement. The tonal character remains unchanged, but the downward dynamic range increases markedly)

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2007, 05:06 AM   #30
germpod is offline germpod  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
((((Acknowledgement are due to Mark M on the crumbs he left that lead to my FE126/127 mod. It would not have been as successful as it is if i wsas not able to stand on his shoulders. I simply took the tools i had available, Mark's comments, and my experience modding drivers & rolled them into something -- if not perfect -- certainly makes an FE126 or FE127 sound WAY better.)))))


I like the Einstein reference of standing on shoulders of people before you. It is one of my favorite quotes, helps me keep perspective off all the work and brilliant minds that helped us all get to where we are.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BIB for FE126E blasko Full Range 2 31st August 2007 04:23 PM
Help!---which t-nut is for FE126E pwan Full Range 7 11th August 2007 03:34 PM
Tweeter for FE126e? klocwerk Full Range 10 6th August 2007 10:29 PM
Here is what I did with my FE126e's audiophile36 Full Range 6 27th October 2006 03:16 PM
FE 127e vs. FE126e CD Full Range 18 22nd December 2004 01:03 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:03 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio