|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have a question about how sensitive a back horn will really be in a real world application. I've always thought that if you have a back horn loaded driver that has a 96 db @ 1W/1M efficiency, you'd get that same efficiency in room with that sort of cabinet.
I was reading Art Dudley's online review of Ed Schilling's "The Horn" in Stereophile, the review of the older version that uses the Fostex FE108E Sigma driver (He currenly uses the FE126). The efficiency of this driver as per the Fostex spec sheet is 90 db @ 1W/1M, but when the speaker was actually measured, they got an efficiency rating of 94 db @ 1W/1M. How is this so? I would think that with a 90 db efficient driver, you'd get a loudspeaker with the same efficiency. Can someone explain this to me? I don't rule out that maybe their measurements could be wrong, but say what you will about their editorial content and reviews, they should be able to make a fairly accurate measurement of this sort. For those that are interested, here is the link to the measurements in the review: http://stereophile.com/loudspeakerre...rn/index4.html
__________________
My religion is the golden rule. The only time it's forsaken me is when I've forsaken it first. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
Sensitivity is measured on an IEC baffle. Baffle step diffraction typically takes up to 6dB off this. So it is not uncommon (in theory at least) to expect up to 6dB less and to knock the midrange off with the crossover.
Large baffles and back horns can attempt to reclaim the lost sensitivity. In the case of the back horn, you can get bass that is greater than the original sensitivity. But back horns don't help in the midrange. What good is loud bass if you don't have midrange to go with it? If you only want bass, then all is good. If you design the horn to have just enough efficiency to give you the right level of bass (to rated sensitivity), that's OK too. You could also horn load the front, or you could let the horn be efficient and actively EQ the bass back down, scoring much more output from your amp. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
This speaker has a small baffle, but it appears that the overall measured response is 94db at one watt input, while the driver itself specs at 90.
I understand that back loaded horns amplify the bass output of low Qts drivers, but how do you account for the increased efficiency from 90 to approximately 94db 1W/1M?
__________________
My religion is the golden rule. The only time it's forsaken me is when I've forsaken it first. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
There appears to be a little peaking at the top end, perhaps some cone breakup. It wouldn't be hard to horn load the bass up to that level. I'm not certain if this is done here, but I feel it wouldn't be right to exploit that.
Rarely do I find that sensitivity lines up. How does a manufacturer come up with it?...I encourage a grain of salt. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ontario
|
As I understand it the smallest baffle size for an IEC baffle is 1350 mm x 1650 mm (for an 8" driver - see http://www.rjbaudio.com/Audiofiles/FRDtools.html) or roughly 41" x 65". This is a (relatively) huge baffle so I can't agree with Indm that the differences in sensitivity related to the baffle step because you'd expect the opposite to what has been measured -- the driver in IEC baffle should be more sensitive. Unfortunately I can't explain the difference though.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
norms, norms...a fullrange's 1W/1m nominal shout is what it does at, I believe, one Kilohertz under DIN specs - nice to build a driver that is a singer from hell on the spec sheet and the DIY crowd have to somehow make it sing. But who cares - we can !
Pit |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Editor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Francisco, USA
|
Quote:
Nelson Pass does this with his J-lo horns I believe. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: near Hamburg Germany
|
what is about this solution:
http://www.hm-moreart.de/102.htm
__________________
http://www.hm-moreart.de |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
BHD - this topic had been recently discussed on a now deleted thread on another forum
I'd suggest you direct your inquiry to Ed, the father of 'the Horn' - I can assure you he'd have a word or 3 on this subject. (if you decide to phone him, take your bathroom break first) |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I suppose I should have posted this on the Horn Shoppe forum, but since I don't own a pair of his speakers I didn't want to waste his time. I was just hoping that someone here could come up with an answer. Thanks to all who took the time to try, though...
__________________
My religion is the golden rule. The only time it's forsaken me is when I've forsaken it first. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using PVC Pipe For A Back Loaded Horn | JimOfOakCreek | Full Range | 13 | 15th April 2008 07:30 PM |
| Back loaded horn bipoles? What? Why? | kaltsoplyn | Full Range | 6 | 19th February 2008 11:37 PM |
| Front loaded and back loaded horn | DrWoofer.com | Subwoofers | 0 | 3rd August 2007 06:55 PM |
| Back Loaded Horn Bending | Tyimo | Multi-Way | 15 | 17th April 2005 05:04 PM |
| Back Loaded Horn Calculations | Tyimo | Multi-Way | 3 | 15th March 2005 03:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11938 seconds (78.58% PHP - 21.42% MySQL) with 10 queries |