|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oklahoma
|
Hi everyone,
I am seeking sugestions for a quality midbass driver that will mate well with the Jordan JXR6 wideband driver in a resonably sized MLTL type enclosure? I do not need to go below 40Hz to 50Hz -3db on the bottom frequency, since I will be using subwoofers below that. I would think a driver that is efficient enough to be used in unison with a coil that will roll it off around 100Hz. And still have the proper efficency to blend with the JXR6 in a two way speaker being driven by a single tube amplifer would be optimum? A driver that has a quick pulse response that will keep up with the smaller JXR6. The JX92S would be a possibility. But, the cost of $370 a pair plus around $35 shipping is making it prohibative for my budget after purchasing the JXR6. Possibly the Neo-Phone driver? Since I am somewhat technically challenged, I hope someone here can help? Thanks for any and all suggestions. Norris Wilson |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Hi,
If you want a sub I think it might be best with bass in closed box This 10" AUDAX looks pretty good, and on buyout - and you might even not need that sub http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showd...number=299-605 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: British Antarctic Territory
|
Maybe the Seas H511? It has similar efficiency, and generally anything madisound puts in their kits ought to be decent. They sell it for $75 each.
If it were me I'd consider a higher crossover, like 200 to 250 Hz, the midwoofs would still only be covering a couple octaves or so. With a higher crossover freq, you could consider a real simple first order filter. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oklahoma
|
Thanks Tinitus, the 10" Audax looks good. Especially since it cost less than $50 each, a good deal. I feel like I could easily get my desired -3db point around 50Hz in a sealed box. I will keep this woofer in mind.
Dumbass, I wanted to run the JXR6 full range without a filter of any kind. Do you feel like there would be a problem with a peak within the overlap of these two drivers with the midbass being rolled off around 200Hz at 6db? The JXR6 in a 2 liter sealed box will yield around 115Hz -3db without stuffing according to the information at the Jordan site. I am not sure how the effect of the sound quality of the JXR6 will be when loading it in a very small enclosure of 1 liter or so t roll it off at a higher frequency? The SEAS P21RF\P looks good as well. Do you feel this driver would be best loaded in a sealed cabinet to obtain the best results for midbass duties? I have access to 4 used Dynaudio 15W75 5.5" woofers. Do you think 2 of these woofers per side rolled off with a 6db slope under the JXR6 would be a good choice? Any other recommendations for midwoofers? Thanks Norris |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Hi,
I think I have to correct my opinion about the Audax Actually this 12" Pioneer seem to give much better result ..... about -6db/35hz..... I think its the one a member was very enthusiastic about http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showd...number=290-118 |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: British Antarctic Territory
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I better hurry to agree, and I might even go higher than 250hz
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oklahoma
|
OK guys,
But I feel I will be loosing something when using a filter on the Jordan driver. I want to keep the midrange as pure as possible. I would like to try the JXR6 without a filter first. So, since the use of a passive filter for the midbass below, say 200Hz is problematic. Where the inductor could be a huge power sucking pig. I would like to switch gears and propose something different. I have the ability to biamp this 50Hz and up speaker using the chosen midbass driver and the Jordan JXR6. I have been pondering the idea of possibly using a Marchand 12db XM44-EMB band pass electronic crossover on the midbass with a dedicated midbass amplifier. http://www.marchandelec.com/xm44.html Say, crossing it over from 50Hz on the bottom to 100Hz, or even 150Hz on top. Then, run the Jordan full range without a filter with a tube amplifier that has a dedicated volume control. And using my subwoofers from 50Hz and down to keep the bass well controlled with impact. Is this an exersize in chasing my tail? Or, would I be better off in using a subwoofer only with the JXR6 and be done with it? For some reason, the mear size of the JXR6 does not give me the confidence that a sub-JXR6 combo would be best. I would think the Jordan will be lacking in the lower midrange and midbass region. The only way to find this out, is to try it when I get the JXR6's. I am just thinking out loud here. Any suggestions other than I may be crazy? Norris |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Well, thats everybodys dream...a crossoverless speaker with huge power ... otherwise your idea is cool, if done right .....well, I have thought of it myself
First, as you will biamp you wont loose any power because of a few filtercomponents...on the contrary....the Jordan isnt excactly high efficient and will need some power....and relieved from the lowend it will withstand high levels much better Second, if you use a sensitive woofer like the pioneer you will actually gain some efficiency.....especially if you use it up to 500hz....actually, just adding a sub might do much worse than a simple filter.....and theres the bafflestep issue Third, your nice 2" Jordan, which actually is midrange, wont have the power below 500hz, that is to exspect from a wellbalanced system .... Forth, Its my impression that you expect "highend" sound ... think of this.... your Jordan combined with a 12" resembles a smaller version of the famous systems with a 15" and 2"horndriver Last, you are afraid to loose the finesse of the Jordan.... good thinking, but theres a risk for that allready with biamping and active filters....allthough not directly connected to the Jordan, its still in the system to mess with what you hear..... keep it simple |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: British Antarctic Territory
|
Quote:
Bi-amping is IMO a great idea, but of course requires that much more investment of time/money. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jordan JXR6 HD Designs | PrimaLuna | Full Range | 81 | 22nd November 2011 05:37 PM |
| Jordan JXR6 HD and JX125 NG available to order. | mdikovics | Full Range | 3 | 12th March 2009 12:58 PM |
| Jordan JXR6 HD vs JX92S | oceanic30 | Multi-Way | 1 | 25th August 2007 08:54 PM |
| Using in the Jordan JXR6 HD in an MTM | David Gatti | Multi-Way | 3 | 7th November 2006 07:52 PM |
| Partner for the Jordan JXR6 | jimbo | Full Range | 23 | 13th March 2006 11:41 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12951 seconds (80.24% PHP - 19.76% MySQL) with 11 queries |