El Cheapo MCM FR drivers - has anyone used them?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Having played with and modified a number of cheap drivers with very good results I'd say these drivers are well worth a try, I'd forget the first one, sensitivity is too low and it won't mod real well with that cone material. The other two look good, I think I'd go for the 5 inch but heck try both.

I wonder about the efficeincy rating for the 4.5 incher, it may well reach that 96db at some point in the range but is likely to be pretty peaky, however it would likely work very well in a double bass enclosure, or maybe a frugel horn even.

For $11.00 though you really can't lose, you'd find a use for them somewhere.

I'd say intergrating them with a car super tweeter crossed over at about 10k would work real well and most likely phase plugs would reap big results.
 
$11 speakers here it comes.

Scottmoose said:
Try a 120in line length, driver at 24in down from the sealed end, 70in^2 terminus area.


I am almost finished, will put up pics and sounds soon..., do u mean 24" down from the top (open end)?, otherwise I will have to flip mine over...

gychang
 

Attachments

  • 2006-10-30_00005a.jpg
    2006-10-30_00005a.jpg
    65.6 KB · Views: 583
Spasticteapot said:
MCM has some 11$ drivers that don't look too bad.

http://www.mcminone.com/product.asp?catalog%5Fname=MCMProducts&product%5Fid=51%2D075

Are any of these worth the cost of shipping?

I finished my project, thanks for your initial suggestion on the speaker, I built one with 4 1/2", Scottmoose gave me dimensions. You can see the speakers here:

http://gychang.smugmug.com/gallery/2055074

read about it here:

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=89831&highlight=


Result is outstanding to say the least, sound is devine to my ear. thanks for putting up the initial suggestion.

gychang
 
Re: Re: El Cheapo MCM FR drivers - has anyone used them?

gychang said:


I finished my project, thanks for your initial suggestion on the speaker, I built one with 4 1/2", Scottmoose gave me dimensions. You can see the speakers here:

http://gychang.smugmug.com/gallery/2055074

read about it here:

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=89831&highlight=


Result is outstanding to say the least, sound is devine to my ear. thanks for putting up the initial suggestion.

gychang

I'm glad I could help. The speakers look sweet!
 
how about higher cabinet?

Scottmoose said:
Try a 120in line length, driver at 24in down from the sealed end, 70in^2 terminus area.


Scottmoose, I have yet another pair of the el cheapo speakers coming (now they are $9/each) and considering what affect will the higher cabinet have? perhaps taller than my height let's say 70"?

Can the foot print be smaller without sacrifacing the sound?

I have been asked to build a pair for my wife's friend. In Southern California the houses tend to have high ceilings.

gychang
 
Greets!

Ooh, good price for this decades old model! The terminus area (Sm) is a function of the driver's mass corner, so it's small for low Qt drivers and large for high Qt drivers, so if you make it <optimum, then the LF/mid-bass may sound 'thin', but of more importance is the loss of acoustic gain to off-set the driver's extreme lack of acoustic output due to a small radiator combined with little usable excursion.

Bottom line, maintain 'Sm' if it works and just lengthen the pipe as required as all it does is lower Fp and the 3rd harmonic dip, which can be a plus if it gets down low enough to be 'lost' in the room's modes/our reduced hearing acuity.

GM
 
GM said:
Greets!

Ooh, good price for this decades old model! The terminus area (Sm) is a function of the driver's mass corner, so it's small for low Qt drivers and large for high Qt drivers, so if you make it <optimum, then the LF/mid-bass may sound 'thin', but of more importance is the loss of acoustic gain to off-set the driver's extreme lack of acoustic output due to a small radiator combined with little usable excursion.

Bottom line, maintain 'Sm' if it works and just lengthen the pipe as required as all it does is lower Fp and the 3rd harmonic dip, which can be a plus if it gets down low enough to be 'lost' in the room's modes/our reduced hearing acuity.

GM

so the footprint should remain, but sounds like I can make the cabinet taller... (not sure about the scientific terms...)

thanks,

gychang
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.