|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
([sorry for the cross post, but it appears the TL specialists reside in this sub forum....)
So I built this nice sub with the Tangband W69-1042 see TL sub with 2 TB69 woofs just a straight TL with A=Sd. Since a co-worker would like a new sub, and he thought the sub with the W69 was rather large, I thought of a similar TL employing the W6-1108SA. both fs and Qt are close to those of the W69 so it was my expectation that I could simply scale the design for the smaller Sd. NOT! The simulation of the TL with MLK's 'driver offset' sheet showed a different respons, much less low. where the W69 had a rather flat curve from 100 down to 40Hz (see pic below) the W6 rolled off much earlier (sorry, forgot to make a snapshot, will post this later) with -5bB @40Hz. I tried to tweak the design, longer pipe, taper but the basic form of the curve remained the same so there's more than just fs and Qt .... here the sim of the W69 sub
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Not surprising. The cone Sd actually has almost nothing to do with the way a TL works you see, it's just frequently used as a convenient measurement. What's more important is line length, driver Vs, and cabinet Vb (volume).
I see from the link it's a non-tapered line, correct? For a tuning frequency with a straight line of 40Hz for example, it needs to be 84in long (tapered lines will be either longer or shorter, depending on whether it's a positive or negative taper). I'd suggest that you start altering the volume of the box. Don't increase the line length; increase / decrease the CSA of the box, and you mght be surprised. I don't have time to run a full sim on them myself, but the drivers are perfectly suitable for QW / TL loading. Best Scott |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
yes, the W69 sub has an untapered line
on your remark, I calc'ed the Vad/Sd and for the W69 it's lower than for the W6, so my 1st try will be a larger cross section so that Vb/Vad is equal for both designs what kind of effect does BL have? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Depends on circumstances -the design, the driver's other parameters, the enclosure and a host of other factors. In this case, not much. I wouldn't worry about it anyway -the drivers are perfectly suitable for a TL / QWR.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
so, here a couple of sims. first the 1st try, this was a 2m straight line with A=Sd
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
this is the tapered, 2.4m long A=1.7Sd - 0.7Sd line
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
and here the fat long straight, 2.4m A=1.25Sd
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
and this is the somewhat narrower tapered line, 2.4m A=1.4Sd - 0.6Sd
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Driver orientation for T/S parameters | Buzzy | Subwoofers | 2 | 7th May 2008 02:39 PM |
| Need T/S parameters for SVS ISD driver | mazeroth | Subwoofers | 0 | 24th October 2006 04:16 AM |
| TL design vs driver parameters | Henkjan | Subwoofers | 0 | 20th September 2006 10:03 AM |
| InfraSub driver parameters? | Hara | Subwoofers | 18 | 30th July 2006 06:00 PM |
| Sen-Lab Driver TS parameters | jjfox | Multi-Way | 4 | 3rd March 2004 03:54 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10361 seconds (74.39% PHP - 25.61% MySQL) with 11 queries |