|11th August 2006, 04:41 PM||#31|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Not me, and yes, it's too often typical, though the industry as a whole considers +/- 10% exceptable, which these meet.
Anyway, the top sim is a T/S max flat using published specs and the bottom one is the measured specs in the same cab. It has marginally better acoustic efficiency, but the trade-off is somewhat degraded transient response which can be improved back to 'stock' with a minor increase in damping, so the spec differences are no big deal IMO for all but the perfectionists among us.
That said, it's not wise to assume that all driver published specs are within +/- 10% or that using them will be 'close enough' for max performance.
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Focal 2-way crossover design options||focal7C||Multi-Way||4||20th August 2008 03:56 AM|
|supravox 285gmf jensen +supravox fronthorn||Jacobus||Multi-Way||3||16th August 2006 01:15 PM|
|Audax 652 design options||SndDoofus||Multi-Way||0||22nd February 2005 07:13 AM|
|3-way design options||goskers||Multi-Way||7||22nd July 2004 07:41 AM|
|New To Site?||Need Help?|