Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Supravox RTF64 design options (long)
Supravox RTF64 design options (long)
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th August 2006, 03:41 PM   #31
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Quote:
Originally posted by schiller
I see that the measured T/S parameters from this site
http://www.yildiz.edu.tr/~ilkorur/speaker/supravox.txt

are much more different from these of the manufacturer. Has anybody else tried to measure them?
I haven't any experience with loydspeakers, could this kind of descrepancy between measured-published specs be typical?
Or in other words: should i take the published spes nicht for granded?

Thanks in advance
Konstantinos
Greets!

Not me, and yes, it's too often typical, though the industry as a whole considers +/- 10% exceptable, which these meet.

Anyway, the top sim is a T/S max flat using published specs and the bottom one is the measured specs in the same cab. It has marginally better acoustic efficiency, but the trade-off is somewhat degraded transient response which can be improved back to 'stock' with a minor increase in damping, so the spec differences are no big deal IMO for all but the perfectionists among us.

That said, it's not wise to assume that all driver published specs are within +/- 10% or that using them will be 'close enough' for max performance.

GM
Attached Images
File Type: jpg supravox 215 rtf64 published vs measured specs.jpg (66.3 KB, 173 views)
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2006, 06:34 PM   #32
Scottmoose is offline Scottmoose  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
A depressing thought on the whole.
__________________
"'That'll do", comes the cry of the perfectionist down the ages.' James May -The Reassembler
www.wodendesign.com Community sites www.frugal-horn.com http://frugal-phile.com/
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Supravox RTF64 design options (long)Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Focal 2-way crossover design options focal7C Multi-Way 4 20th August 2008 02:56 AM
supravox 285gmf jensen +supravox fronthorn Jacobus Multi-Way 3 16th August 2006 12:15 PM
Audax 652 design options SndDoofus Multi-Way 0 22nd February 2005 06:13 AM
3-way design options goskers Multi-Way 7 22nd July 2004 06:41 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio
Wiki