|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Malmö
|
I’m planning to make a Cyburg Needle, I have recently tried to build an LongTall speaker whit pour result. So before I start my next little project I will try to fool-proofe my construction before I start.
In my LongTall I used a TB W3-315SC, and so comes the question.. In all the Cyburg-Needle designs I have seen so far they all use the TB W3-871S. Will it also work well whit the 315SC? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Malmö
|
From the answers (or in this case the lack of answers) i conclude that there isn’t any that have tried the suggested construct using the mentioned driver.
Is there any way to figure out if there is a match coupling, the w3-315SC and the Cyburgs-Needle? Driver data http://www.ritlab.jp/shop/product/sp.../w3-315sc.html |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
|
I have been reading of a needle-design with Visaton FR8. But i wanted some better bass, so i made them some wider and fitted Visaton's FR10. Its was my first diy fullrange speaker project. All dimensions are allmost the same, but width now 13 cm. Now its not a needle anymore, but can be considered as "Cyburgs Pole" or something like that.
Very nice sounding, especially the stereo depth because of lacking crossover filter. The hill in the frequency curve has to be filtered though with FR10. No dig. camera at hand unfortunately.
__________________
Daisy Bell |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Copenhagen
|
Hi Marius
I have analysed the Needle, and the performance is the same with the Tang Band I have tested. However, the Needle is not a construction I would start búilidng - just my own personal opinion. Hi from Bjorn |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
|
Quote:
The FR10's cones are treated with dampening fluid from Visaton: LTS 50 against coloration (I am used to Bextrene woofers) For Tang Band units this is not nessesary.
__________________
Daisy Bell |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
Quote:
btw: based on simulation (I have yet to build my pair of needles) the Omnes Audio BB3.01 perform surprisingly well in the needle |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tarn
|
Does the Omes Audio BB3.01 need another filter since the parameters differ a bit from the TangBand
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
yes it does. I used "half" that of the CT222 (R1, C1, L1 in the attached pic)
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tarn
|
You actually built needles with the Omnes ? How does it perform?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
yes, I built them. performed very well. as expected the highs are much better than the W3-871S, but also the low is better (but only slight). The W3-871S is still a fine speaker, but imho the BB3.01 is well worth the extra money
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cyburgs Needle kit | ebijma | Full Range | 5 | 13th October 2007 10:53 AM |
| Cyburgs-Needle and Cyburgs-Pipe for FRS 8 | Cyburgs | Multi-Way | 20 | 2nd October 2007 08:24 PM |
| Will this work? Cyburgs-Needle+Sub+Tweeters | Ruben19 | Full Range | 2 | 23rd November 2005 10:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12880 seconds (71.31% PHP - 28.69% MySQL) with 11 queries |