Jx92s VTL - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th March 2006, 02:16 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Russ White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Send a message via Yahoo to Russ White
Default Jx92s VTL

I am considering for my first full range speaker project a Jordan JX92S Transmission Line design. Has anyone here done a similar project? It seems like a great driver for under $400 a pair.
__________________
Less pulp more juice Twisted Pear Audio.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2006, 05:01 AM   #2
maxro is offline maxro  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
maxro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Survey says: Least happiest city in Canada
You didn't do a search, did you? Having heard neither myself, it seems that GM's MLTL designs are preferred here over the VTL from the Jordan site.

Max
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2006, 06:09 AM   #3
Dumbass is offline Dumbass  British Antarctic Territory
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: British Antarctic Territory
Quote:
Originally posted by maxro
it seems that GM's MLTL designs are preferred here over the VTL from the Jordan site.
I forget who modelled the VTL using Martin King's software; anyway, the VTL was designed BEFORE that software was available.

I tend to agree, the two GM designs (31" and 48") look awfully good and have gotten good reviews.

One nice thing about the VTL is the wide baffle. I think that's a big part of why it sounds so good. Also, I think the VTL performs better in-room than modeling would indicate.

One could do a lot worse than a pair of JX92S.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2006, 06:17 AM   #4
richv is offline richv  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Holland
Default Different MLTL-48 designs

BTW - does anyone know why the MLTL-48 from the Jordan site is smaller then the one originally posted by abpea? Is one more evolved then the other - is there a preference?

New 48" ML-TL Review

http://www.ejjordan.co.uk/diy/index.html

Thanks, Richard.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2006, 11:50 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Russ White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Send a message via Yahoo to Russ White
Sincere thanks to all of you for the great ideas and links.

I did search a bit (for about an hour) but was not finding the concise view I recieved here. Sorry if I inconveinanced any of you.

I will post more on my experiences as I build these speakers. These are nice drivers, I am very impressed with the quality out of the box.

Cheers!
Russ
__________________
Less pulp more juice Twisted Pear Audio.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2006, 12:52 PM   #6
Tintin is offline Tintin  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Tintin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lund, Sweden
I am considering building speakers with the JX-92S driver as well and it ends up in either GM's cabinets (most likely the 48") or in Peter Milletts MLTQWP (alphabet soup extraordinaire these assignments) found at http://www.pmillett.com/jx92s.htm. RAndyB reported building some designs on the driver and was not very happy with the VLT and I think he eventually used Peters design.

I suppose either of the GM31 or the GM48 cabinets would have their own merits, Colin hinted that someone preferred the 48" to the 31" while the 31" could give a more accurate response http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...280#post789280

Has anyone auditioned both? Opinions on Peters design?

// Jonas
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2006, 05:07 PM   #7
Colin is offline Colin  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Hi - Bruce (abpea) built both MLTLs (and the VTL). GM has mentioned a couple of times that the 31" is the more accurate, closer to a true monitor. The 48 veers towards a musical instrument presentation.

I'm using the 48" and find it an addictive speaker to listen to, with really engaging bass (without sounding overwarm or full). Note that this is on some quite nimble-sounding Naim amps, so others may not suit. The Gainclone should be a good match, from the descriptions I've read.

I've heard the VTL, which I liked but didn't feel had the bass reach of the MLTLs - though it wasn't a side-by-side comparison. If you keep the internal cross sectional area the same, you could build a wide baffle version of the MLTLs. Bruce has done this and retained the triangular cross-section. I went for the triangle shown on the Jordan site. (The measurements there came from GM and should be the final spec.)

BVruce's review of the various MLTL variants is here.

One more thing -protect the drivers when you're fitting them as it only takes a dropped bolt to gain a dent. Mark Audio sells some neat plastic covers which fit onto the driver bolts with magnets. You take 'em off to listen and fit back on quick when there are children and/or animals around. (Why do dogs like to stuff their noses directly against the source of sound when a loudspeaker is playing?)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JX92S On SALE! mdikovics Full Range 40 13th July 2008 03:42 PM
Which First Watt amp for the JX92S ejfud Pass Labs 8 28th June 2008 09:28 PM
BIB for JX92S ? britbug Full Range 22 26th February 2008 07:10 AM
Lvc for JX92S Dave Jones Full Range 2 19th August 2003 04:23 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:06 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2